· Private foundation
New Hope Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k47 grants · $197k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $322k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION | $30,000 |
| HOPE INTERNATIONAL | $30,000 |
| MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM | $27,500 |
| BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP | $25,000 |
| DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $22,500 |
| SAINTS MARY AND MATHIAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $20,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES | $18,000 |
| SPRING VALLEY BIBLE CAMP | $17,000 |
| INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE | $16,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $15,000 |
| MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y | $15,000 |
| SALT COMPANY AT CORNERSTONE | $13,000 |
| THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of New Hope Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IOINSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC5× · 2018–2022 · $300k · revenue +17%
HOPE INTERNATIONAL8× · 2018–2025 · $195k · revenue +125%- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION8× · 2018–2025 · $193k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- CCCORNERSTONE CHURCH OF AMES IA (SALT COMPANY FUND)one grant, 2020 · $8k
- FFFOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATIONone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -4%
- WMWORLD METHODIST EVANGELISM INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS INC ↗
- Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗
- Who funds THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds THE CONFESSING MOVEMENT WITHIN THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds Alpha USA ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN COVENANT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds Global CHE Enterprises ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: HNI Charitable Foundation · The Howe Foundation · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · Jensen Private Foundation Inc · Voorhees Family Foundation · United Way of Muscatine Iowa · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · Stanley Consultants Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Muscatine Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Hope Foundation?
Find your warmest path to New Hope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.