How much does Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation give?

Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $173,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 15 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.

Who are Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Wishes Can Happen Inc ($83k), Oaks Community Church ($75k), Whole Latte Love Cafe Inc ($60k).

Does Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 80% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Stark Community Foundation, Hoover Foundation Income Account, Christ Foundation.

Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation

Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$50k

Largest

01What it funds

0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$274kHealth$151kHuman Services$130kRecreation & Sports$123kYouth Development$79kEmployment$60kFood & Nutrition$38kArts & Culture$26kOther$0

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $4k
$10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$50k–250k3 grants · $150k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$466k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Perry Christian Church	$50,000
The Summit Church	$50,000
The Oaks Community Church	$50,000
Wishes Can Happen	$20,000
TomTod Ideas Inc	$1,500
American Cancer Society	$1,000
Safe Harbor Ohio	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 86%.

Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$352k · 11 repeat orgs$582k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +308% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$352k

$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+308%

+57%

Still filing today

55%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WC
WISHES CAN HAPPEN INC
6× · 2019–2024 · $83k · revenue +57%
PH
Perry Helping Perry
3× · 2020–2022 · $19k · revenue +35%
TI
TOMTOD IDEAS INC
5× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +322%

Funded once

PC
Pregnancy Choices
one grant, 2019 · $85k
LE
Little Eden Camp
one grant, 2022 · $75k
WL
Whole Latte Love Cafe Incgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +144% · 27% of their budget

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services

Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

—

Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health

Starkville Pregnancy Care Center

Christ centered ministry whose mission is to promote a culture for life within our community by serving people facing unexpected pregnancies, and to empower men and women to make wise choices by promoting the benefits of healthly relations…

Human Services

Ohio Center for Hope

To promote mental health research in medical developments

Health

Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—

The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services

Hope Ministries

Hope ministries is one of the largest private providers of free meals, safe shelter, and comprehensive life-recovery support for homeless, near-homeless, and hungry men, women, and children in iowa. the mission of hope ministries is to…

Human Services

Access Health Stark County Inc

Our mission is to provide access to a coordinated system of health care and community resources for those that are underserved and impacted by community conditions.

Health

The Hope Center

The mission of The Hope Center is to help restore what is broken in our world, in our community, and in each of us.

Human Services

Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health

Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hilliard Food Pantry Plus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

16/22

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$746,200Health$100,000Human Services$49,900Youth Development$13,500International$12,000Philanthropy$6,000Education$5,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Christ Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Stan R Arner and Nancy a Arner’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home