Skip to content
Stacy and Witbeck Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Stacy and Witbeck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$93kYouth Development$25kEmployment$25kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$6kCommunity Improvement$3kArts & Culture$1kCivil Rights$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSTRUCTING HOPE$37,000
MOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC$15,000
FUTURE LEADERS PROGRAM$15,000
OREGON TRADESWOMAN INC$15,000
INROADS INC$10,000
CONFERENCE OF MINORITY TRANPORTATION OFFICIALS$10,000
CENTRAL TEXAS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$7,500
CYPRESS MANDELA TRAINING CENTER$7,500
GRANITE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$7,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,500
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$7,500
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$6,350
UNITED WAY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$5,000
COLLEGE TRACK$5,000
FUTURE CONSTRUCTION LEADERS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $3k → 6%FAMILY TREE INC: $3k → 7%UNITED COMMUNITY: $2k → 6%UNITED COMMUNITY: $1k → 6%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$219k · 12 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$219k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+14%

Still filing today

92%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    Future Leaders Program
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +452% · 60% of their budget
  • MC
    MOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +69%
  • LB
    LONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • LI
    LATINOS IN TRANSIT
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CI
    CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
2
College Futures Foundation
Public Benefit
3
10000 Degrees

10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…

Education
4
College Match

College match partners with high schools in los angeles county to identify high-achieving, low-income high school students and provide them with the necessary tools and guidance to get into top-ranked colleges with significant financial…

Education
5
Los Angeles Team Mentoring Inc

Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.

Youth Development
6
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
7
Education Forward Arizona

To advocate for high-quality education and training that aligns with career and workforce opportunities to advance the quality of life for all arizonans.

—
8
Chicana Foundation of Northern Ca Dba Chicana Latina Foundation

The mission of chicana latina foundation is the empowerment of chicanas/latinas by supporting their personal, professional and educational advancement.

—
9
Above & Beyond Teaching formerly - Carlston Family Foundation
Education
10
Agc Construction Educational Foundation

Construction education foundation's mission is to develop and promote educational programs that expand and strengthen the professionalism and effectiveness of people in the construction industry and to promote the construction education as…

Employment
11
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
12
California State Student Association

CSSA as a student-led organization strives to improve the lives of California State University (CSU) students by advocating for student needs and engaging students in systemwide, state, and federal higher education policy making.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program; the most unlike its peers is Future Leaders Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
15/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program: $37,000 · EducationConstructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship ProgramINROADS INC: $30,000 · EducationINROADS INCLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATIONCYPRESS MANDELA TRAINING CENTER: $17,500 · EducationCYPRESS MANDELA TRAINING CENTERGranite Education Foundation: $14,500 · EducationGranite Education FoundationCOLLEGE TRACK: $10,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACKCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $9,500 · EducationCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,350 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationFuture Leaders Program: $40,000 · OtherFuture Leaders ProgramCENTRAL TEXAS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherCENTRAL TEXAS CONSTRUCTION IN…LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $7,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BAN…Individual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherOPEN ARMS FOOD BANK: $5,000 · OtherSO CAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherUNITED WAY INC: $5,000 · Other+13 more: $20,700 · Other+13 moreMOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC: $40,000 · ReligionMOLES CHARIT…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 · Human ServicesLEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLATINOS IN TRANSIT: $10,000 · Public BenefitCONFERENCE OF MINORITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS: $10,000 · Public BenefitHEVIN: $1,000 · Public BenefitOregon Tradeswomen Inc: $20,000 · EmploymentFuture Construction Leaders Foundation: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMaris Place: $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$151,850Other$95,700Religion$40,000Human Services$27,500Public Benefit$21,000Employment$20,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFuture Leaders Program: $40,000 over 3y, 60% of budgetMOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC: $40,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetINROADS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOregon Tradeswomen Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCYPRESS MANDELA TRAINING CENTER: $17,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGranite Education Foundation: $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLATINOS IN TRANSIT: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFuture Construction Leaders Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEVIN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSENIOR ACCESS TX: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMaris Place: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF THE BAY AREA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stacy and Witbeck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stacy and Witbeck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Oregon Tradeswomen Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stacy and Witbeck Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stacy and Witbeck Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stacy and Witbeck’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home