· Private foundation
Stacy and Witbeck Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUTURE LEADERS PROGRAM | $15,000 |
| MOLES CHARITABLE FUND | $15,000 |
| CSULB 49ER FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| CYPRESS MANDELA TRAINING CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| INROADS INC | $10,000 |
| LATINOS IN TRANSIT | $10,000 |
| CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $9,500 |
| GRANITE EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| OREGON TRADESWOMEN | $5,000 |
| COLLEGE TRACK | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| OPEN ARMS FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| FAMILY TREE INC | $5,000 |
| LEND A HAND FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LBLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +135%
- MCMOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +69%
- FLFuture Leaders Program2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +452% · 60% of their budget
Funded once
- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $1k
- MPMaris Placeone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +15%
- SASENIOR ACCESS TXone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…
College match partners with high schools in los angeles county to identify high-achieving, low-income high school students and provide them with the necessary tools and guidance to get into top-ranked colleges with significant financial…
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
Fce's mission is to increase the number of first-generation, low-income students of color from east palo alto, ca and surrounding communities who graduate with a degree from a four-year college or university. fce was founded out of a…
To improve lives in orange county by delivering measurable long-term solutions to complex issues in education, financial stability, and housing. orange county united way (ocuw) is committed to breaking barriers and improving lives for…
Train untapped young adults ages 16-24 for careers in the Tech industry so we can build wealth and prosperity in local diverse communities.
To empower low-income youth and families to break systemic barriers and emerge as successful professionals and community leaders.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inroads Inc and the most unlike its peers is Future Leaders Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Future Leaders Program ↗
- Who funds INROADS INC ↗
- Who funds CYPRESS MANDELA TRAINING CENTER ↗
- Who funds LATINOS IN TRANSIT ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEND A HAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Granite Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Oregon Tradeswomen Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ACCESS TX ↗
- Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HEVIN ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF THE BAY AREA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stacy and Witbeck Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stacy and Witbeck Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Stacy and Witbeck Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.