Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Mary's Hospital & Medical Center Inc

We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health ofthe people and communities we serve, especially those who are poorand vulnerable.

$20M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$100MEducation$3.2MHousing & Shelter$291kCommunity Improvement$223kHuman Services$92kRecreation & Sports$73kPhilanthropy$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$64kOther$7.6M
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $19,932,334 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $20,426,789 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $494,455 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $251k
  • $250k+4 grants · $20M
$35,020
Median grant
1
States reached
$890M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERMOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE INC$17,858,330
ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,090,984
MARILLAC CLINIC INC$305,000
MIND SPRINGS FOUNDATION INC$250,000
MESA COUNTY$80,000
HOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY$60,000
HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION$57,500
COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$53,100
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$38,000
GRAND JUNCTION ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP$35,020
GREATER GRAND JUNCTION SPORTS COMMISSION$20,000
GRAND JUNCTION AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$17,150
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO$10,500
CITIZENS FOR D51 SCHOOLS ISSUE COMMITTEE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $13k → 11%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION INC: $10k → 11%COUNSELING & EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 11%COUNSELING & EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION: $10k → 11%COUNSELING & EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 11%COUNSELING & EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$110M · 23 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$110M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+31%

Still filing today

74%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INTERMOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $92M · revenue +35%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +106%
  • MC
    MARILLAC CLINIC INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.1M · revenue +31%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $121k
  • GJ
    GRAND JUNCTION AIR SHOW INC
    one grant, 2023 · $52k · revenue -98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
2
Colorado Health Institute
Health
3
Colorado West Healthcare System

The mission of colorado west healthcare system and community hospital is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
4
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
5
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health
7
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Clinica Colorado

To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.

Health
10
Colorado Health Network Inc
Health
11
Moab Valley Healthcare Inc

Our dedicated team puts the patient first, delivers quality cost-effective healthcare and promotes wellness to all we serve.

Health
12
Glendale Memorial Health Foundation

Provide direct services to the poor and advocate on their behalf and create partnerships that improve community health.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kiani Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr16%86%20–35yr12%0%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
2/44
the rest of the field
13%
467/3,585

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERMOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE INC — $92,269,845 · HealthINTERMOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE INC+9 more — $7,291,661 · Health+9 moreST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $7,149,677 · Other+17 more — $629,912 · OtherCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,070,600 · Education+4 more — $113,300 · EducationHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY — $291,000 · Housing & ShelterGRAND JUNCTION ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP — $192,520 · Community ImprovementGREATER GRAND JUNCTION SPORTS COMMISSION — $30,500 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION — $70,000 · Human ServicesGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesGRAND JUNCTION AIR SHOW INC — $52,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $10,500 · Recreation & SportsRMO GOLF INC — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$99,561,506Other$7,779,589Education$3,183,900Housing & Shelter$291,000Community Improvement$223,020Human Services$92,000Recreation & Sports$72,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERMOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE INC — $92,269,845 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $7,149,677 over 7y, 24% of budgetCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,070,600 over 3y, 15% of budgetMARILLAC CLINIC INC — $2,129,457 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetQUALITY HEALTH NETWORK — $1,505,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $1,500,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetST MARY'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER INC — $1,063,404 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $370,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY — $291,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CRAIG FOUNDATION INC — $196,000 over 3y, 73% of budgetGRAND JUNCTION ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP — $192,520 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetCENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION — $70,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetHopeWest — $64,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDISTRICT 51 FOUNDATION — $63,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetGRAND JUNCTION AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $52,650 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGRAND JUNCTION AIR SHOW INC — $52,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetKIANI FOUNDATION — $50,799 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $38,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMESA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetGREATER GRAND JUNCTION SPORTS COMMISSION — $30,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRMO GOLF INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetDELTA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCOLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCitizens for D51 Schools — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $8,627 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWestern Slope Center For Children — $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH WEST FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PUEBLO FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $5,300 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Western Colorado Comm…Rocky Mountain Health…United Way of Mesa Co…Colorado Gives Founda…International Associa…The Goodwin FoundationBacon Family Foundati…The Colorado Health F…El Pomar FoundationMile High United Way …Wilson Family Foundat…Boettcher Foundation
Western Colorado Community Foundation IncCO44.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · United Way of Mesa County Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · International Association of Lions 3602 · The Goodwin Foundation · Bacon Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Wilson Family Foundation · Boettcher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Mary's Hospital & Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines