Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK

QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,809,606 to it, the largest being ST MARY'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER INC ($1,505,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$5.6M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
$837k
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Quality Health Network does

Mission

To optimize the whole-person health of the more than 400,000 residents of the western colorado medical trade area qhn serves. Qhn's health information exchange (hie) improves the efficiency, timeliness, and quality of the healthcare provided for all, with a focus on non-profit providers, rural hospitals, and clinics, public health services, safety-net providers, and community-based organizations to reduce the burden on government programs. The services qhn provides improve the ability of healthcare providers to collaborate, coordinate treatment, manage and prevent illness, and reduce costly duplicative testing and medical errors that are attributable to insufficient access to timely, accurate clinical information.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Data management:qhn utilizes a secure hie network as the foundation for the services provided to health organizations and providers to support the quadruple aim in healthcare improving patient outcomes, improving the physician experience, improving patient experience, and reducing the cost of healthcare for all. Since its inception, qhn has continued a steady focus on its founding purpose of expanding the opportunity, resources, and infrastructure necessary to increase the widespread provision of highquality coordinated healthcare. The provision of services by the qhn network has placed western colorado in a strong position to achieve innovative, meaningful healthcare reforms. Qhn continues to support cross-state and cross-regional hie-to-hie connectivity. This is an effort to improve the coordination and continuity of care statewide, and as people travel across state borders. This hie-to-hie information exchange work was established statewide with contexture, the hie that serves the eastern part of colorado, and has been expanded to include the hies in utah (uhin) and arizona (contexture). This type of exchange, based on the patient-centered data home (pcdh) concept, is a…

    $2,377,179 spent$2,834,566 earned by the program
    58% of program spending
  2. Clinical improvement, population health management and chronic disease management:while the chronically ill comprise a relatively small percentage of the total population, they historically account for a large percentage of the healthcare delivery system resources and associated expenses. Medicare and medicaid eligible populations suffer disproportionately from chronic illnesses. A key component of qhn's quality improvement activities is the provision and implementation of high-value technical applications to support providers' ability to identify and manage the care of chronically ill patients. These applications support population health management, risk stratification, predictive modeling tools, and proactive care coordination to reduce the burden on these government supported programs. These tools help in the early identification and treatment of patients with chronic disease to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. As the electronic network connectivity work in the qhn medical trade area continues to mature, the process to improve evidence-based, coordinated care for chronic disease is progressing by implementing these sophisticated applications. This helps…

    $1,129,294 spent$1,346,577 earned by the program
    28% of program spending
  3. Indigent care support in qhn's medical trade area, the estimated underserved (uninsured or underinsured) population approaches 30 percent. This population tends to be transitory in nature, as the area attracts many seasonal and short-term workers in the farming, service, and recreational industries. These underserved patients often "float" in and out of eligibility for insurance/financial assistance and other government supported subsidies and present for care in multiple care settings. To effectively treat this population, access to current patient eligibility and clinical information from previous care episodes is critical. The qhn hie supports equitable treatment for all patients wherever they may present for care by providing accurate patient demographics to authorized providers to assist with ascertaining eligibility and clinical information to support care coordination and continuity. The cohorts of underserved patients positively impacted by this qhn functionality are most frequently medicaid and/or medicare eligible. The resulting effect of this system functionality is more efficient, cost effective care for this underserved population, which helps reduce the burden on…

    $447,119 spent$533,148 earned by the program
    11% of program spending
  4. Support for public health programs: qhn continues to work with public health and community providers to improve patient care and public health through the timely exchange of, and access to, health information. The mesa county health department (mchd) has a unidirectional interface with qhn for direct delivery of transcription and laboratory and radiology results, adt's and has been actively involved in the community care coordination pilot. Qhn continues to work with other public health agencies throughout western colorado to share information and improve the connectivity with the qhn network. To better serve the indigent population in mesa county, mchd partnered with marillac clinic, the federally qualified health center (fqhc) in the grand junction area, colocating a marillac clinic within the health department. This has allowed patients who seek care at mchd to have quick and easy access to a full range of medical services, including vision and dental care. Qhn supports these public health programs, mchd and marillac clinic, through its existing secure highspeed electronic data collection/delivery infrastructure in addition to qhn's work supporting other fqhcs across qhn's…

    $112,176 spent$133,759 earned by the program
    3% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,065,768.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.8M) Expenses 100 ($3.5M) Net assets 100 ($4.7M)2018 Revenue 106 ($5.1M) Expenses 119 ($4.1M) Net assets 120 ($5.6M)2019 Revenue 112 ($5.4M) Expenses 134 ($4.7M) Net assets 135 ($6.3M)2020 Revenue 136 ($6.5M) Expenses 148 ($5.1M) Net assets 164 ($7.7M)2021 Revenue 152 ($7.3M) Expenses 173 ($6.0M) Net assets 191 ($8.9M)2022 Revenue 110 ($5.3M) Expenses 174 ($6.1M) Net assets 173 ($8.1M)2023 Revenue 121 ($5.8M) Expenses 196 ($6.8M) Net assets 151 ($7.1M)2024 Revenue 117 ($5.6M) Expenses 136 ($4.7M) Net assets 18 ($837k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (117)Expenses (136)Net assets (18)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $8.3M to $1.0M (−88%).

$5.2M
$6.2M
$7.0M
$8.7M
$10M
$9.3M
$8.3M
$1.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

9% of QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.3M
’17
$943k
’18
$695k
’19
$1.3M
’20
$1.3M
’21
−$807k
’22
−$1.0M
’23
$837k
’24
13
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Melissa Kotrys

Chief executive officer & treasurer

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1415141516202524
Joined·+1+2+2+3+8+7+12
No longer listed·03124213
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $300k → $80k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
total
funders
1
1
4
2
1
1

From the IRS filings of QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK.

83%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 69% · 2020 64% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 8,121 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,121 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $706k on record.

Federal$706k
grants $0contracts $706k
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$706k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 10%Fundraising 4%

Governance

3
board members
0%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

76%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • Health Current · exempt
  • Colorado Regional Health Information Organization · exempt
  • Contexture · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK?
QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,809,606 to it, the largest being ST MARY'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER INC ($1,505,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $1,809,606 in grants to QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK?
ST MARY'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,505,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like QUALITY HEALTH NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Quality Health Network →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing