Skip to content
St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$19MEducation$117kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$10kPublic Benefit$6k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $3,860,673, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,188,593 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,327,920 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.9M
$3,853,673
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Lukes Health Foundation Ltd$3,853,673
Idaho Shakespeare Festival$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Canine Assistants Inc: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 6 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$23M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20M · revenue +188%
  • HO
    HANDS OF HOPE NORTHWEST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +75% · 38% of their budget
  • IS
    IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CA
    CANINE ASSISTANTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • PI
    PTA IDAHO CONGRESS
    one grant, 2022 · $23k
  • FS
    Filer School District 413
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
2
Bonner General Hospital Foundation Inc

The Bonner General Health Foundation is committed to advancing the promise to change and save lives through philanthropy by developing resources and creating awareness that helps expand the trust the community has in Bonner General Health.

Health
3
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
4
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
5
Idaho Hispanic Foundation Inc
Human Services
6
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
7
Pta Idaho Congress aka Webster Pta

To support the education, health, and welfare of all children and youth.

—
8
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
9
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

—
10
Idaho Technology Council Foundation

The corporation advances charitable and educational initiatives as an affiliate of the Idaho Technology Council. It promotes digiatl literacy technology education and workforce readiness across Idaho by funding and delivering…

Science & Tech
11
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
12
Idaho Ffa Foundation Inc

To Promote Premier Leadership, Personal Growth and Career Success of Idaho FFA Members and Agricultural Education Students by Providing Strategic Financial Resources for the Idaho FFA Association

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boise Public Schools Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Boys & Girls Clubs of Canyon County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $20,401,755 · HealthSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd+1 more: $20,000 · HealthHANDS OF HOPE NORTHWEST INC: $2,259,551 · InternationalHANDS OF HO…NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherPTA IDAHO CONGRESS: $22,500 · OtherFiler School District 413: $20,000 · OtherGlenns Ferry School District: $17,500 · OtherNAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $16,000 · OtherEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc: $15,000 · OtherJEROME JT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 261: $15,000 · OtherWEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6,400 · OtherTHE NAMPA FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $6,100 · OtherCANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education
Health$20,421,755International$2,259,551Other$148,500Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$21,000Youth Development$11,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $20,401,755 over 9y, 16% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE NORTHWEST INC: $2,259,551 over 9y, 38% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE CROSS OF IDAHO FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Luke's Health Syst…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Idaho Community Found…The Albertsons Compan…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
St Luke's Health System LtdID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home