Loading…
· Public charity
St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd
Provide healthcare services to the community.
$4.8M
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
1
Communities
$3.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$15MInternational$2.3MHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$11kEducation$5kOther$149k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
boise districtyouth
2020
district
2021
district
2022
hemophiliableeding disorders
2023
hemophiliableeding disorders
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $250k+1 grant · $3.0M
$2,961,153
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
- St Lukes Health Foundation Ltd$2,961,153
- Idaho Shakespeare Festival$7,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 5 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
11
Total granted
$17M
$159k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+75%
+42%
Still filing today
100%
36%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSt Lukes Health Foundation Ltd7× · 2018–2024 · $15M · revenue +78%
- HOHands of Hope Northwest Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +75% · 38% of their budget
- ISIdaho Shakespeare Festival2× · 2023–2024 · $14k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- CACanine Assistants Incone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -5%
- LELowell Elementary PTSAone grant, 2022 · $23k
- FSFiler School District 413one grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Idaho Medical Association Foundation
Health
2
Idaho State University Foundation Inc
To solicit, hold and manage donations for Idaho State University.
Education
3
Bonner General Hospital Foundation Inc
Bonner General Hospital Fdtn is committed to advancing the promise of life through philanthropy.
Health
4
University of Idaho Foundation Inc
Inspire, manage & distribute private support to enhance the excellence of University of Idaho
Education
5
Uss Idaho Commissioning Foundation
The corporation is organized and operated to support the commissioning of the submarine USS Idaho (SSN 799)and related activities to raise awareness within the State of Idaho about the construction and commissioning.
—
6
Boise State University Foundation Inc
To inspire, generate, and prudently manage private support for Boise State University.
Education
7
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
8
National Kidney Foundation of Utah
The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…
Health
9
Hospice of Eastern Idaho Inc
Compassionate care as it should be.
Health
10
Idaho Fraternal Order of Police
Crime & Legal
11
Idaho Foundation for Parks and Lands
To preserve and protect, for public benefit, open space lands and unique natural, scenic settings throughout the state of idaho utilizing various flexible conservation methods.
Environment
12
Idaho Law Foundation Inc
To educate the public, provide indigent legal services and improve the administration of justice.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boise Public Schools Education and the most unlike its peers is The Boys & Girls Clubs of Canyon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$15,097,693International$2,259,551Other$148,500Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$14,000Youth Development$11,000Education$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds St Lukes Health Foundation Ltd ↗
- Who funds Hands of Hope Northwest Inc ↗
- Who funds National Hemophilia Foundation ↗
- Who funds Canine Assistants Inc ↗
- Who funds West Ada Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Idaho Shakespeare Festival ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Nampa ↗
- Who funds Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation ↗
- Who funds Boise Public Schools Education Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
St Luke's Health System LtdID22.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Hands of Hope Northwest Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +75% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 841398889 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Hands of Hope Northwest Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 38% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd?
Find your warmest path to St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines