Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

$4.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$19MEducation$117kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$10kPublic Benefit$6k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $2,968,153 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,835,520 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,867,367 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.0M
$2,961,153
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Lukes Health Foundation Ltd$2,961,153
Idaho Shakespeare Festival$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Canine Assistants Inc: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 6 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$19M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +67%
  • HO
    HANDS OF HOPE NORTHWEST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +75% · 38% of their budget
  • IS
    IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $14k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CA
    CANINE ASSISTANTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • PI
    PTA IDAHO CONGRESS
    one grant, 2022 · $23k
  • FS
    Filer School District 413
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
2
Bonner General Hospital Foundation Inc

The Bonner General Health Foundation is committed to advancing the promise to change and save lives through philanthropy by developing resources and creating awareness that helps expand the trust the community has in Bonner General Health.

Health
3
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
4
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
5
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
6
Idaho Hispanic Foundation Inc
Human Services
7
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

8
Idaho Technology Council Foundation

The corporation advances charitable and educational initiatives as an affiliate of the Idaho Technology Council. It promotes digiatl literacy technology education and workforce readiness across Idaho by funding and delivering…

Science & Tech
9
Pta Idaho Congress aka Webster Pta

To support the education, health, and welfare of all children and youth.

10
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
11
Idaho Ffa Foundation Inc

To Promote Premier Leadership, Personal Growth and Career Success of Idaho FFA Members and Agricultural Education Students by Providing Strategic Financial Resources for the Idaho FFA Association

Youth Development
12
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boise Public Schools Education Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Boys & Girls Clubs of Canyon County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $16,548,082 · HealthSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd+1 more — $20,000 · HealthHANDS OF HOPE NORTHWEST INC — $2,259,551 · InternationalHANDS OF HOPE…NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherPTA IDAHO CONGRESS — $22,500 · OtherFiler School District 413 — $20,000 · OtherGlenns Ferry School District — $17,500 · OtherNAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $16,000 · OtherJEROME JT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 261 — $15,000 · OtherEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc — $15,000 · OtherWEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $6,400 · OtherTHE NAMPA FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER — $6,100 · OtherCANINE ASSISTANTS INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC — $14,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC — $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Education
Health$16,568,082International$2,259,551Other$148,500Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$14,000Youth Development$11,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $16,548,082 over 8y, 16% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE NORTHWEST INC — $2,259,551 over 8y, 38% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE ASSISTANTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLUE CROSS OF IDAHO FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC — $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Luke's Health System LtdID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph