· Private foundation
Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
84% of Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Humboldt Area Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289 named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $9k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Betty Chinn Homeless Fund | $1,000 |
| Humboldt Community Breast Gyn Proje | $1,000 |
| Planned Parenthood Northern CA | $800 |
| American Civil Liberties Union | $700 |
| Food for Thought Food Bank | $500 |
| North Coast Rape Crisis Team | $400 |
| Redwood Empire Food Bank | $400 |
| Cooperation Humboldt | $400 |
| Food For People | $400 |
| Arcata House | $400 |
| Amnesty International | $400 |
| Humboldt Unitarian Universalist Fel | $400 |
| Hospice of Humboldt | $400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| Friends of the Dunes | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +63%
- AHARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue ×13
- FFFOOD FOR PEOPLE INC5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- HAHSU Advancement Foundationone grant, 2017 · $29k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $1k
- RCRed Cross Disaster Reliefone grant, 2017 · $800
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
The norwegian refugee council usa (nrc usa) is a non-profit organization that was incorporated under the laws of the district of columbia in october 2015 and commenced operations during 2016. nrc usa was established with two primary…
Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…
Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…
The foundation's purpose is to unite people regardless of their political, cultural, and ideological orientations in the common cause of defending human rights and promoting liberal democracy globally. the mission is to ensure that freedom…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
We are activists and grant-makers working in solidarity with individuals and organizations promoting human rights in their communities. by investing in those on the frontlines of human rights struggles, we help build stronger, more…
Araha strives to alleviate human suffering and build self-reliant communities, by providing humanitarian aid and empowering individuals in the horn of africa and here at home.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dog Is My Copilot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY HUMBOLDT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cooperation Humboldt ↗
- Who funds SAVORY INSTITUTEORG INC ↗
- Who funds ARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds INK PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds North Coast Rape Crisis Team ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds HUMBOLDT LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HUMBOLDT INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN RULE CHARITY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EUREKA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Nonviolent Peaceforce ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Humboldt Area Foundation · Patricia D & William B Smullin Foundation · Coast Central Credit Union · The Schmidbauer Family Foundation · Humboldt Health Foundation · St Joseph Hospital of Eureka · The Mel and Grace McLean Foundation · Christine & Jalmer Berg Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289?
Find your warmest path to Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.