Skip to content

· Private foundation

St Joseph Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$182kEducation$60kHuman Services$20kHealth$15kInternational$13kCivil Rights$10kYouth Development$3k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY$100,000
CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF MILWAUKEE$20,000
MARY QUEEN OF HEAVEN$15,000
UWM NEWMAN CENTER$12,000
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF MILWAUKEE$10,000
THOMAS MORE SOCIETY$10,000
LOVE ONE ANOTHER$10,000
HOLY FAMILY PARISH SCHOOL$10,000
RELEVANT RADIO$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA$7,000
OUTREACH FOR WORLD HOPE$6,500
NATIONAL SHRINE OF OUR LADY CHAMPIO$5,000
THE CULTURE PROJECT$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$207k · 6 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$207k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $112k
  • MQ
    MARY QUEEN OF HEAVEN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k
  • IH
    IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • Journey 21 Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION - MADISON INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
3
Ave Maria Communications

Ave Maria Communications (AMC)employs radio, internet and other media to offer news, analysis, teaching, devotion and music to demonstrate Catholic values.

Religion
4
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
5
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
6
Wichita Adore Ministries

Bringing souls face to face with the Eucharistic Heart of Jesus Christ and forming missionaries of the New Evangelization. The organization has realized this mission by providing music and production services for worship events.

Religion
7
Chesterton Academy of St Philip Neri

Inspired by Saint Pope John Paul II, we take as our motto Cultura Vitae, the culture of life, as our students triumph over the materialism and despair that pervades our culture in order to have life and have it abundantly. We do this with…

Education
8
Wisconsin Independent Christian School Inc

Valley christian school pursues educational excellence through christ centered programs to produce servant leaders.

Education
9
Theresians International Inc

Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It establishes small communities worldwide for women to further their spiritual and educational development.

—
10
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
11
Vocation Ministry

Vocation Ministry's mission is to equip the Church once again to awaken the call of a vocation within the human heart by creating an environment that encourages men and women to say "Yes" to God's call in their lives to the priesthood,…

Education
12
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immaculate Heart Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is Journey 21 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
0/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $112,000 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARYMARY QUEEN OF HEAVEN: $25,000 · OtherMARY QUEEN OF HEAVENUWM NEWMAN CENTER: $12,000 · OtherUWM NEWMAN CENTERLOVE ONE ANOTHER TRUST: $10,000 · OtherLOVE ONE ANOTHER TRUSTHOLY FAMILY PARISH: $10,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY PARISH+1 more: $5,000 · OtherChesterton Academy of Milw Inc: $20,000 · EducationChesterton Aca…UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $17,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $20,000 · ReligionIMMACULATE …YOUTH WITH A MISSION - MADISON INC: $10,000 · ReligionYOUTH WITH …Womens Care Center of Milwaukee Corp: $20,000 · Human ServicesJourney 21 Inc: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterOUTREACH FOR WORLD HOPE INC: $12,500 · InternationalTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $10,000 · Crime & LegalThe Culture Project International: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$174,000Education$37,500Religion$30,000Human Services$20,000Housing & Shelter$15,000International$12,500Crime & Legal$10,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChesterton Academy of Milw Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWomens Care Center of Milwaukee Corp: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJourney 21 Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOUTREACH FOR WORLD HOPE INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Culture Project International: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · American Endowment Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Joseph Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Joseph Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to St Joseph Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to St Joseph Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Joseph’s filings →

    More from the funding graph