Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Helena Hospital

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$7.1MHuman Services$293kPhilanthropy$93kFood & Nutrition$23kInternational$20kCommunity Improvement$11kRecreation & Sports$8kEnvironment$8k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $73,427 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $103,338 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,911 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$220M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UpValley Family Centers of Napa County$30,038
California Health Fund & Trust$15,389
Zero Prostate Cancer Run$10,000
Mentis Sponsorship$10,000
Napa Valley Vine Trail Coalition$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UpValley Family Centers of Napa County: $30k → 9%UpValley Family Centers of Napa County: $25k → 9%UpValley Family Centers of Napa County: $25k → 9%UpValley Family Centers of Napa County: $15k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $13k → 9%UpValley Family Centers of Napa County: $10k → 9%Aldea Inc: $15k → 9%Mentis Sponsorship: $10k → 9%Mentis Sponsorship: $10k → 9%Collabria Care: $10k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Services: $5k → 9%Mentis: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$6.4M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$6.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+75%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $118k · revenue +59%
  • ZP
    ZERO PROSTATE CANCER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +104%
  • M
    MENTIS
    3× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • SH
    St Helena Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $6.3M · revenue +12%
  • RG
    Radiant Global Logistics Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • AS
    Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Helena Hospital

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
2
Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

3
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
4
Alliance of Catholic Health Care

Healthcare trade association

5
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
6
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Aliados Health

See schedule o.aliados health is a regional association of 17 community health centers with sites in marin, napa, sonoma, contra costa, solano, and yolo counties. the organization was formed in 1994. our mission is to improve access to,…

Health
8
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
9
Chac Fka Community Health Awareness Council

Chac seeks to improve lives and strengthen communities through access to comprehensive and culturally responsive mental health services in northern santa clara county.

Health
10
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
11
California Association of Health Plans

To serve our member health plans by creating and sustaining an environment that permits them to maintain viability and grow as organizations dedicated to coordinating or providing high quality, affordable, accessible health care to their…

12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aldea Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Helena Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Helena Hospital Foundation — $6,311,458 · HealthSt Helena Hospital Foundation+3 more — $70,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST — $769,357 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $181,360 · Human ServicesUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $118,038 · Human ServicesMENTIS — $27,000 · Human ServicesALDEA INC — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesRadiant Global Logistics Inc — $19,795 · OtherSt Helena Chamber of Commerce — $10,500 · OtherNapa Valley Vine Trail Coalition — $15,500 · EnvironmentNAPA VALLEY GRAPEGROWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$6,381,458Philanthropy$769,357Human Services$356,398Other$30,295Environment$15,500Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST — $769,357 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $181,360 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $118,038 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMENTIS — $27,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALDEA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNapa Valley Vine Trail Coalition — $15,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSt Helena Chamber of Commerce — $10,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNAPA VALLEY GRAPEGROWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLABRIA CARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McNabb FoundationDE17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Queen of the Valley Medical Center · McMinn Foundation · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Helena Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to St Helena Hospital?

    Find your warmest path to St Helena Hospital through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph