Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ssm Health Care Corporation

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

$401k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$822kCommunity Improvement$402kHuman Services$166kRecreation & Sports$139kEducation$88kArts & Culture$65kYouth Development$51kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $167,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $401,081 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $233,831 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $137k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICAS HEALTH CARE$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR DANE COUNTY PARKS$25,000
FOND DU LAC FESTIVALS INC$17,000
ST LOUIS SPORTS FOUNDATION INC$15,000
MARCH OF DIMES INC$15,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC$10,000
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREEN COUNTY$9,250
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$7,500
MADISON GOSPEL 5K FOUNDATION$7,500
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BARABOO$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Catholic Charities: $25k → 10%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $8k → 11%UNITED WAY OF GREEN COUNTY: $9k → 7%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $8k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR DANE COUNTY PARKS: $25k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $10k → 21%THE SARAH COMMUNITY: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
MO
VA
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$756k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
32

Total granted

$1.1M
$645k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
97%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $420k · revenue +621%
  • CG
    CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $91k · revenue +284%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -34%
  • BA
    BARABOO AREA HOMELESS SHELTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +43%
  • NF
    NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
2
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Ssm-Sluh Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
5
St Charles Health System Inc

To own, manage and operate hospitals in Central Oregon, as well as the care of sick, injured and infirm and the carrying on, participation in and sponsorship of health-related services and activities in the communities.

Health
6
St Mary's Foundation Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
7
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
8
Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center Inc

Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.

Health
9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
Ssm St Clare Health Center Foundation

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of God.

—
11
St Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Association

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

—
12
Ssm Health Care Group

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Sports Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baraboo Area Homeless Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Senior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%11%5–10yr16%9%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr24%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%22%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr15%8%20–35yr16%18%35–55yr24%50%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,438

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
29/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS — $420,365 · OtherSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUISRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS — $100,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUISCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $90,600 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONCIVIC PROGRESS INC — $72,500 · OtherCIVIC PROGRESS INCARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS — $46,750 · Other+17 more — $245,815 · Other+17 moreGREATER ST LOUIS INC — $291,440 · Community ImprovementGREATER ST LOUIS …American Heart Association Inc — $78,333 · HealthAmerican Heart As…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $46,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER S…MARCH OF DIMES INC — $35,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES IN…COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $25,000 · HealthCOALITION TO STRE…PINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $20,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD …GENERATE HEALTH STL — $20,000 · HealthGENERATE HEALTH S…MADISON GOSPEL 5K FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC — $10,000 · HealthCASA DE SALUD — $10,000 · HealthSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $15,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $25,200 · Human ServicesCENTRO HISPANO INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR DANE COUNTY PARKS INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE SARAH COMMUNITY — $15,401 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $15,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS — $10,000 · Human ServicesStephenson County Senior Center DBA Senior Resource Center — $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Green County Inc — $9,250 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationBOOKS FOR NEWBORNS INC — $6,000 · EducationCHAMPIONS OF HOPE — $6,000 · EducationMADISON FESTIVALS INC — $24,000 · Recreation & SportsEdmond Soccer Club Inc — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsST LOUIS SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTRAILNET INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBARABOO AREA HOMELESS SHELTER — $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$976,030Community Improvement$291,440Health$284,333Human Services$144,851Education$72,000Recreation & Sports$69,000Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS — $420,365 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS INC — $291,440 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $90,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $78,333 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCIVIC PROGRESS INC — $72,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBARABOO AREA HOMELESS SHELTER — $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetNORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $46,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $25,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORDANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR DANE COUNTY PARKS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMADISON FESTIVALS INC — $24,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INCORPORATED — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGENERATE HEALTH STL — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCIRCUS FLORA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetEXCELLENCE IN MISSOURI FOUNDATION DBA MIDWEST EXCELLENCE INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetEdmond Soccer Club Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetST LOUIS SPORTS COMMISSION INC — $19,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOND DU LAC FESTIVALS INC — $17,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE SARAH COMMUNITY — $15,401 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON GOSPEL 5K FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST LOUIS SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $10,105 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStephenson County Senior Center DBA Senior Resource Center — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE SALUD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAILNET INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Green County Inc — $9,250 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMT VERNON FESTIVALS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetCLAYTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR NEWBORNS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetENVISION GREATER FOND DU LAC INC — $5,760 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAlmost Home — $5,700 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…Commerce Bancshares F…Moneta Group Charitab…Madison Community Fou…Washington UniversityEdward Jones Foundati…The Foundation for Ba…Ameren Charitable Tru…Youthbridge Community…Edward Jones Foundati…
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Madison Community Foundation · Washington University · Edward Jones Foundation · The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital · Ameren Charitable Trust (Union Electric · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ssm Health Care Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home