Skip to content

· Private foundation

SS Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$276k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$861kEducation$338kArts & Culture$239kHealth$106kReligion$19kPublic Benefit$9kRecreation & Sports$7kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
High Point Village$57,425
Lubbock Dream Center$50,000
Lubbock Symphony Orchestra$40,000
Texas Tech School of Music$30,000
Methodist Children's Home$25,000
Texas Tech Foundation$20,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Lubbock Impact$10,000
Junior Achievement of Abiline$5,000
Parkridge$5,000
West Texas ALS Support Group$3,000
Stick Horses and Capes$2,500
Texas NF Foundation$2,500
Science Spectrum$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $235k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Methodist Childrens Home Waco: $25k → 16%Parallel Resource Corp: $25k → 8%Parallel Resource Corp: $25k → 8%Methodist Children's Home: $25k → 17%Methodist Children's Home: $25k → 17%Methodist Children's Home: $25k → 17%Methodist Children's Home: $25k → 17%Lubbock Dream Center: $50k → 17%Lubbock Impact: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 16 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+34%

Still filing today

44%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $618k · revenue +43% · 37% of their budget
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $313k · revenue +68%
  • LS
    LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • SV
    Star Valley Health Charitable Found
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • TT
    Texas Tech Univ - Big Cure
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • TS
    TTUHSC - School of Medicine
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
2
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
3
Lubbock Christian University Foundation

Raising funds to support the activities of lubbock christian university and to fund capital projects for instructional facilities for lubbock christian university.

Education
4
Ywca of Lubbock Legacy Fund Inc

The ywca of lubbock legacy fund inc. is dedicated to meeting the needs of the ywca of lubbock in supporting the community through its mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for…

Philanthropy
5
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
6
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
7
Young Women's Christian Association of Lubbock

The young women's christian association of lubbock is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

—
8
Lubbock Area United Way Inc

Giving people hope. working to address the root issues of the significant challenges facing our south plains communities to create lasting, positive change.

Philanthropy
9
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce Foundation
—
10
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

—
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Lubbock Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
12
Lubbock Community Theatre

Provide cultural and performing arts programs for our community.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $618,212 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT VILLAGE INCMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $125,000 · Human ServicesMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOMELUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK DREAM CENTERPARALLEL RESOURCE CORPORATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesPARALLEL RESOURCE CORPORATION INC+4 more: $16,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $312,500 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION …+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTexas Tech School of Music: $65,000 · OtherTexas Tech School of…Burkhart Center for Autism: $36,000 · OtherBurkhart Center for …Individual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…Star Valley Health Charitable Found: $20,000 · OtherStar Valley Health C…Texas Tech Univ - Big Cure: $20,000 · OtherTexas Tech Univ - Bi…TTUHSC - School of Medicine: $20,000 · OtherTTUHSC - School of M…LUBBOCK CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $17,500 · OtherLUBBOCK CHAMBER ORCH…Individual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · Other+16 more: $76,250 · Other+16 moreLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK SY…+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWEST TEXAS ALS SUPPORT GROUP: $3,000 · HealthLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $2,000 · HealthCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP: $1,000 · Religion
Human Services$859,212Education$322,500Other$300,750Arts & Culture$153,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$5,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $618,212 over 6y, 37% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $312,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $150,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARALLEL RESOURCE CORPORATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetLUBBOCK CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $17,500 over 3y, 32% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARALLEL RESOURCE CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS ALS SUPPORT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds STICK HORSES AND CAPES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE SPECTRUM INC ↗
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS CHILDREN'S CHORUS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ch Foundation IncTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ch Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Kuykendall Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · C and a McDonald Family Foundation · The Evelyn M Davies Foundation Trust · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · Texas Instruments Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SS Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SS Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to SS Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to SS Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on SS’ filings →

    More from the funding graph