Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Springfield Regional Arts Council

To transform lives and enrich our community through the arts.

$229k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $183,916 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $228,695 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,779 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM$20,000
SCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD$20,000
MOXIE CINEMA$20,000
OZARKS LYRIC OPERA$20,000
KSMU$20,000
SPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC$10,000
SPRINGFIELD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$10,000
AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF SPRINGFIE$10,000
SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS$10,000
LIVING LANDS ART COLLECTIVE$9,880
PLOTLINE$7,528
SPRINGFIELD DANCE ALLIANCE$7,000
QUEEN CITY CHORALE COMMUNITY ASSOCI$7,000
SPRINGFIELD CONTEMPORARY THEATRE$6,508
SISTER CITIES ASSOCATION OF SPRINGF$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NIXA DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION COMMIT: $9k → 8%SPRINGFIELD CHAMBER CHORUS: $10k → 15%SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 18%LIVING LANDS ART COLLECTIVE: $10k → 19%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD: $10k → 15%AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF SPRINGFIE: $10k → 15%SPRINGFIELD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10k → 15%AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF SPRINGFIE: $10k → 15%PLOTLINE: $8k → 15%PLOTLINE: $7k → 15%SPRINGFIELD MULTICULTURAL FESTIVAL: $10k → 15%SPRINGFIELD DANCE ALLIANCE: $7k → 15%SPRINGFIELD CONTEMPORARY THEATRE: $7k → 15%SCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD: $20k → 15%SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM: $20k → 15%SCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD: $20k → 15%SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM: $20k → 15%QUEEN CITY CHORALE COMMUNITY ASSOCI: $7k → 15%SISTER CITIES ASSOCATION OF SPRINGF: $6k → 15%KSMU: $20k → 15%KSMU: $20k → 15%MOXIE CINEMA: $20k → 15%MOXIE CINEMA: $20k → 15%OZARKS LYRIC OPERA: $20k → 15%OZARKS LYRIC OPERA: $20k → 15%SPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC: $10k → 15%MISSOURI PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$194k · 6 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$194k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
0%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +257%
  • DS
    Downtown Springfield Community Cinema Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue -23%

Funded once

  • K
    KSMU
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SPRINGFIELD CHAMBER CHORUS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springfield Theatre Centre

To bring our community and the performing arts together. We strive to provide central Illinois with quality theatre, learning opportunities, and a creative outlet for live theatrical arts.

Arts & Culture
2
Springfield Community Players Inc

Volunteer Community Theater. We produce around 4 plays a year without paid personal. We enrich our community with the performing arts.

3
Springfield Municipal Opera Association

Community theatre

Arts & Culture
4
Southwest Missouri Museum Associates Inc

Support of municipal art museum.

Arts & Culture
5
Earth Day Springfield Festival

Organize music and sustainability festivals for the public , the proceeds from which will benefit local environmental organizations

Environment
6
Springfield Symphony Orchestra Association

The mission of the springfield symphony orchestra is to enrich the lives of the people in springfield and the surrounding region by presenting quality performances of symphonic music and providing excellent education programs.

Arts & Culture
7
Springfield Ballet Company

None

8
Springfield Art Association of Edwards Place

A visual arts organization who promotes, supports and provides educational opportunities for Springfield, IL, and maintains the Edwards Place House Museum.

Arts & Culture
9
Springfield Area Arts Council

To enrich the community by promoting and supporting all art forms and providing creative opportunities to participate in and enjoy the arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Springfield Arts Council Inc

To build a better community by sharing the performing arts with all citizens of Springfield, Clark County, and surrounding region.

11
Sioux City Community Theater

Promotion of and presentation of dramatic arts

Arts & Culture
12
Springfield Performing Arts Development Corp

To consistently deliver high quality professional entertainment for all the citizens of western massachusetts thereby enhancing the quality of each life, increasing awareness and patronage of the performing arts, and actively contributing…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield Little Theatre Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sculpture Walk Springfield. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
2/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC — $40,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INCAMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI — $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURIKSMU — $20,000 · OtherKSMUPLOTLINE — $14,131 · OtherPLOTLINESpringfield Symphony Association — $10,000 · OtherSpringfield Symphony AssociationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $10,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INCLIVING LANDS ART COLLECTIVE — $9,880 · OtherLIVING LANDS ART COLLECTIVENIXA DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE — $8,797 · OtherMISSOURI PHILHARMONIC PARTNERS — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherQUEEN CITY CHORALE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD DANCE ALLIANCE — $7,000 · OtherSISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI — $6,000 · OtherSCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELDDowntown Springfield Community Cinema Inc — $40,000 · Arts & CultureDowntown Springfield Community Cinema IncSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INCGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTSSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INCSPRINGFIELD CHAMBER CHORUS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD CHAMBER CHORUSUNITE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureUNITE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI INCSPRINGFIELD CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC — $6,508 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Education
Other$167,308Arts & Culture$166,508Education$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD — $40,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetDowntown Springfield Community Cinema Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC — $40,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INC — $40,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpringfield Symphony Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI INC — $10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC — $6,508 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI — $6,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Hatch Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Meek Charitable Trust · Musgrave Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Forvis Mazars Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Springfield Regional Arts Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph