Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Meek Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$36kYouth Development$14kReligion$10kCrime & Legal$9kEducation$7kHuman Services$6kFood & Nutrition$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$205k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mercy Health Foundation$2,000
The Child Advocacy Center$1,500
Boy Scouts of America$1,000
LifeHouse Crisis Maternity Home$1,000
Springfield Symphony Orchestra$500
Springfield Workshop Foundation$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Help Give Hope: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$78k · 14 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$78k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+25%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +49%
  • TC
    THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +46%
  • SB
    SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • OC
    OZARK CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MS
    MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • SC
    Springfield Contempory Theatre
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
2
Springfield College

The mission of springfield college is to educate students in spirit, mind and body for leadership in service to others by building on a foundation of the college's humanics philosophy, academic excellence, service, and student success.…

Education
3
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Foundation

The siue foundation exists to support the mission, vision, and values of southern illinois university edwardsville. on behalf of the university, the foundation provides fundraising coordination and implementation, serves as the steward for…

Education
6
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
9
Board of Control for Southern Regional Education

The board of control for southern regional education shall be devoted to the task of assisting states, institutions and agencies concerned with higher education in their efforts to advance knowledge and to improve the social and economic…

Education
10
Missouri Southern Foundation

To provide financial support to missouri southern state university from donations from the public for scholarships, awards to students, departmental support, cultural activities, general college support and faculty development.

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

12
Simpson University

Simpson university is a christ-centered learning community committed to developing each student in mind, faith, and character for a life-time of meaningful work and service in a constantly changing world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mercy Health Foundation — $17,500 · OtherMercy Health FoundationOZARK CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $10,000 · OtherOZARK CHRISTIAN CHURCHBoy Scouts of America — $8,000 · OtherBoy Scouts of AmericaLifeHouse Crisis Maternity Home — $5,500 · OtherLifeHouse Crisis Maternity HomeBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $4,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INCLife House Crisis Maternity — $2,000 · OtherSpringfield Symphony Association — $2,000 · Other+3 more — $3,750 · Other+3 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $16,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $9,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD …CONVOY OF HOPE — $5,750 · InternationalIPOURLIFE INC — $1,500 · InternationalSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · EducationMISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC — $1,500 · EducationMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationSpringfield Workshop Foundation Inc — $2,500 · EmploymentSPRINGFIELD CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC — $500 · Arts & CultureHELP GIVE HOPE — $500 · Human Services
Other$53,250Health$16,000Crime & Legal$9,000International$7,250Education$7,000Employment$2,500Arts & Culture$500Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $5,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSpringfield Workshop Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSpringfield Symphony Association — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIPOURLIFE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC — $1,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELP GIVE HOPE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC
  • Who funds Springfield Workshop Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Springfield Symphony Association
  • Who funds IPOURLIFE INC
  • Who funds MISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC
  • Who funds MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC
  • Who funds HELP GIVE HOPE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Cook Family Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Springfield Regional Arts Council · The Turner Family Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Meek Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph