Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hatch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$2.5MYouth Development$987kRecreation & Sports$935kEducation$839kArts & Culture$664kHuman Services$651kEnvironment$375kHousing & Shelter$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $391k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $449k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDMAN - HATCH PHILANTHROPY FUND$1,400,000
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$200,000
CARE TO LEARN$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD$99,100
Individual grant recipient$50,000
FRIENDS OF SPRINGFIELD ART MUSUEM$30,000
SUMMIT PREPARATORY SCHOOL$30,000
OZARKS TECH FOUNDATION$25,000
MSU FOUNDATION$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS$25,000
THE OZARKS FILM FOUNDRY$25,000
SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL$25,000
NEAT NEIGHBORS PROGRAM$22,500
SCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD$21,050
GILLIOZ CENTER FOR ARTS$20,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION: $250k → 15%DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%Drew Lewis Foundation: $829 → 15%DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION: $542 → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $100k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $30k → 15%Elevate Lives: $25k → 15%Care to Learn: $22k → 15%OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $30k → 15%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $4k → 15%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 40 repeat orgs$491k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
16

Total granted

$6.2M
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+11%

Still filing today

53%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $902k · revenue +237%
  • DL
    DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $301k · revenue +34%
  • CT
    Care to Learn
    3× · 2022–2025 · $152k · revenue +223%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -89%
  • SP
    SUMMIT PREPATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • NC
    NEW COVENANT ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Agricultural Foundation

The foundation's mission is to support projects that promote sound agricultural practices, growth in agribusiness and agritourism, international agricultural exports, urban agriculture, food safety, farm safety practices, youth development…

Food & Nutrition
2
Columbia Farmers Market Inc

The mission of Columbia Farmers Market is to provide a space for our vibrant community of growers, producers, and makers by supporting, educating, and expanding sustainable Mid-Missouri agriculture. By

Food & Nutrition
3
The Springfield Project

The mission of the springfield project is to unite springfield as a community by working to improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods. the project seeks to empower citizens to develop solutions to problems that they identify in…

Community Improvement
4
Springfield Arts Council Inc

To build a better community by sharing the performing arts with all citizens of Springfield, Clark County, and surrounding region.

5
Downtown Springfield Inc

To help make downtown springfield an ideal place to shop, work, visit, invest, and live.

Community Improvement
6
Springfield Business Development Corporation

To provide a continued revenue source for the chamber's economic development program; assisting business and industry and attracting new business and industry to the springfield region.

7
Missouri Cybersecurity Center of Excellence - Mccoe

Accelerating the springfield, mo cyber economy and positioning it as a state hub of cyber innovation.

Community Improvement
8
Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to foster a prosperous community by strengthening, representing, and promoting business while adhering to our values - model excellence, embody innovation, practice stewardship, demonstrate integrity, and deliver a welcoming…

Community Improvement
9
St Charles County Parks Foundation Inc

Providing financial and volunteer support for parks in st charles county missouri.

Recreation & Sports
10
Discovery Center of Springfield Inc

A science center based museum providing hands-on educational experiences to all people through interactive exhibits, school presentations and video conferencing nationwide, youth and adults learn more about living through science facts.

Arts & Culture
11
Springfield Preservation & Revitalization Council Inc

The mission of SPAR is to ensure Historic Springfield is a preferred place to live and do business by leading programs that drive the preservation, revitalization, and balanced growth of our community.

Arts & Culture
12
Springfield Schools Foundation

To support the educational mission of springfield local school district by receiving, managing and distribution gifts to benefit students, faculty and programs.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Darr Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%15%<5yr12%15%5–10yr16%21%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr24%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr12%7%5–10yr16%16%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr24%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
13%
221/1,662

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
19/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOLDMAN - HATCH PHILANTHROPY FUND — $1,700,000 · OtherGOLDMAN - HATCH PHILANTHROPY FUNDBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $901,996 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INCTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $400,000 · OtherTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATIONSPS FOUNDATION — $370,040 · OtherSPS FOUNDATIONGillioz Center for Arts — $225,700 · Other+38 more — $1,540,893 · Other+38 moreGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $600,765 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADV…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $214,967 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…THE GIVING SQUARE INC — $32,216 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,675 · PhilanthropyOZARK GREENWAYS INC — $311,647 · EnvironmentOZARK GRE…WATERSHED COMMITTEE OF THE OZARKS INC — $301,000 · EnvironmentWATERSHED…EARTH DAY SPRINGFIELD FESTIVAL — $30,000 · Environment+1 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentDREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC — $301,371 · Human ServicesCare to Learn — $152,000 · Human ServicesOZARKS REGIONAL YMCA — $30,000 · Human ServicesElevate Lives — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $6,625 · Human ServicesSCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD — $96,050 · Arts & CultureSpringfield Daily Citizen Inc — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $7,500 · Arts & CultureSMITTYS MIDWEST BOXING GYM & YOUTH CENTER INC — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsTRAILSPRING INC — $22,500 · Recreation & SportsMSU BEARS FOOTBALL PLAYERS ASSOC IN — $12,500 · Recreation & SportsMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $62,500 · Education
Other$5,138,629Philanthropy$849,623Environment$657,647Human Services$514,996Arts & Culture$163,550Recreation & Sports$75,000Education$62,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $901,996 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $600,765 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOZARK GREENWAYS INC — $311,647 over 4y, 21% of budgetDREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC — $301,371 over 3y, 13% of budgetWATERSHED COMMITTEE OF THE OZARKS INC — $301,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $214,967 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCare to Learn — $152,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD — $96,050 over 3y, 50% of budgetSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL — $82,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSpringfield Daily Citizen Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNEW COVENANT ACADEMY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ASKINOSIE FOUNDATION — $47,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetSMITTYS MIDWEST BOXING GYM & YOUTH CENTER INC — $40,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetTHE GIVING SQUARE INC — $32,216 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetRuck 'N' Run Inc — $30,798 over 2y, 36% of budgetOZARKS REGIONAL YMCA — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDynamic Strides Therapy Inc — $28,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetElevate Lives — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTRAILSPRING INC — $22,500 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JAMES RIVER BASIN PARTNERSHIP — $15,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMSU BEARS FOOTBALL PLAYERS ASSOC IN — $12,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $6,625 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSPRINGFIELD INNOVATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 97% of budgetSpringfield Area Chamber of Commerce Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHistory Museum on the Square Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFoundation for Springfield Public Schools — $1,928 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDARR FAMILY FOUNDATION — $1,675 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC
  • Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC
  • Who funds OZARK GREENWAYS INC
  • Who funds DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WATERSHED COMMITTEE OF THE OZARKS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC
  • Who funds Care to Learn
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds SCULPTURE WALK SPRINGFIELD
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL
  • Who funds MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Springfield Daily Citizen Inc
  • Who funds NEW COVENANT ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE ASKINOSIE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SMITTYS MIDWEST BOXING GYM & YOUTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE GIVING SQUARE INC
  • Who funds Ruck 'N' Run Inc
  • Who funds OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA
  • Who funds EARTH DAY SPRINGFIELD FESTIVAL
  • Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc
  • Who funds Elevate Lives

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO43.2× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Cook Family Foundation · Mercy Health Springfield Communities · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Turner Family Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Musgrave Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hatch Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hatch Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hatch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph