Skip to content

· Public charity

Springboard for the Arts

To cultivate vibrant arts communities by connecting artists with the skills, information and services they need to make a living and a life.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
90
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$288k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$5.2MArts & Culture$3.9MHuman Services$684kPhilanthropy$456kCommunity Improvement$360kScience & Tech$181kRecreation & Sports$102kReligion$82kOther$0
02FY2025 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 90 grants below total $2,896,279, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,674,429 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $778,150 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $179k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $288k
$20,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUNNY ASIAN WOMEN KOLLECTIVE$287,798
COW TIPPING PRESS$247,141
QUEER VOICES MINNESOTA$185,884
RARE PRODUTIONS LLC$153,500
DEBORAH RAMOS$90,940
REASONS FOR MOVING$65,399
TRILINGUA CINEMA$64,197
GO KO GO LLC$63,728
YEARLY EMERGING PRACTICES$62,925
QUEER GAZE LLC$56,161
LESLIE PARKER DANCE PROJECT$53,492
MAIA MAIDEN PRODUCTIONS$52,029
VALERIE OLIVEIRO$52,000
OLOLADE GBADAMOSI$46,500
PICTURE BOOK PARADE$46,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEDXMINNEAPOLIS: $44k → 11%TEDxMinneapolis: $32k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
OR
SD
IA
PA
CA
CO
AZ
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.3M · 129 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

129 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2025, 75 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

129
127

Total granted

$9.3M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+69%

Still filing today

8%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $938k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureScience & TechHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NATIVE SKYWATCHERS INCORPORATED
    5× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +7% · 33% of their budget
  • TD
    THE DIAL GROUP INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $91k · revenue +70%
  • MH
    MONKEYBEARS HARMOLODIC WORKSHOP
    2× · 2019–2020 · $66k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TT
    TRADEMARK THEATERgraduated
    2× · 2017–2019 · $97k · revenue +38% · 62% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $79k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2019 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Theatre Three Collaborative Inc

Cultural and educational performances

—
2
Theatre Artibus

Artibus is dedicated to strengthening community through the experience of live performance. We are a hub in Denver for intimate, original performances that explore important social themes and for building community through shared space,…

—
3
State of the Arts Productions
Arts & Culture
4
Strike Theater Inc

Strike Theater is dedicated to building a community for original creative works in the Twin Cities.

Arts & Culture
5
An Opera Theatre

To produce socially relevant works in order to break down the barriers of the classical art form and bring communities together.

Arts & Culture
6
Baltimore Theatre Project

Artistic Programs

Arts & Culture
7
Mirror Stage

Mirror Stage uses the power of story and art to challenge assumptions, bias and prejudice, increasing equity and inclusion, while encouraging more thoughtful reflection on today's issues.

Arts & Culture
8
Ghost Road Company

The Ghost Road Company develops original performance pieces employing Ensemble-Devising and collaborative creation techniques creating experimental theatrical works that are highly physical visceral and visual The companys work emphasizes…

Arts & Culture
9
Constella Arts

Constella Arts produces performances, educational presentations and digital content, along the way changing how people perceive classical music and the performing arts.

—
10
Annex Theatre

The performance of live performance to the general public. Annex Theatre is a democratic collective of theatre artists dedicated to creating bold new work in an environment of improbability, resourcefulness, and risk.

Arts & Culture
11
Rootstock Arts

Foster professional development of creative artists

Arts & Culture
12
Haven Arts Theatre

We are a theatre company. We provide opportunities for local theatre artists and high quality productions for the public.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosy Simas Danse Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fools Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 292 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/32
Grantees still filing
13/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUNNY ASIAN WOMEN KOLLECTIVE: $544,040 · OtherFUNNY ASIAN WOMEN KOLLECTIVECOW TIPPING PRESS: $490,473 · OtherRARE PRODUTIONS LLC: $339,600 · Other+182 more: $8,752,583 · Other+182 moreTheatre 55: $199,712 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC FUNCTIONARY: $103,671 · Arts & CultureTRADEMARK THEATER: $97,073 · Arts & CultureTriLingua Cinema: $92,559 · Arts & CulturePRIME PRODUCTIONS: $78,367 · Arts & CultureMONKEYBEARS HARMOLODIC WORKSHOP: $66,350 · Arts & CultureOPERATUNITY THEATRE: $53,297 · Arts & CultureVOICES OF HOPE: $49,870 · Arts & CultureCrosshatch Center for Art & Ecology: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSpacetaker: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $38,008 · Arts & CultureNATIVE SKYWATCHERS INCORPORATED: $181,181 · Science & TechTEDxMinneapolis Incorporated: $75,857 · Human ServicesInternational Cello Institute: $36,945 · Education
Other$10,126,696Arts & Culture$858,907Science & Tech$181,181Human Services$75,857Education$36,945

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTheatre 55: $199,712 over 4y, 50% of budgetNATIVE SKYWATCHERS INCORPORATED: $181,181 over 5y, 33% of budgetTRADEMARK THEATER: $97,073 over 2y, 62% of budgetTriLingua Cinema: $92,559 over 2y, 59% of budgetTEDxMinneapolis Incorporated: $75,857 over 2y, 43% of budgetOPERATUNITY THEATRE: $53,297 over 2y, 78% of budgetCrosshatch Center for Art & Ecology: $40,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSIDEWALK DETROIT: $40,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetInternational Cello Institute: $36,945 over 2y, 20% of budgetOPERA READING PROJECT: $23,184 over 1y, 32% of budgetROSY SIMAS DANSE INC: $20,301 over 2y, 8.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Theatre 55 ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE SKYWATCHERS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC FUNCTIONARY ↗
  • Who funds TRADEMARK THEATER ↗
  • Who funds TriLingua Cinema ↗
  • Who funds THE DIAL GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIME PRODUCTIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jerome Foundation IncMN16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jerome Foundation Inc · Minnesota Humanities Center · The McKnight Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Propel Nonprofits · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Springboard for the Arts funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Springboard for the Arts. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 292 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Springboard for the Arts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph