· Public charity
Propel Nonprofits
The mission of PROPEL NONPROFITS is to fuel the impact and effectiveness of nonprofits with guidance, expertise, and capital.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k59 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+1 grant · $623k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROOTED TO LAST | $623,250 |
| GOOD TROUBLE | $212,423 |
| RESIDENTIAL PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA | $185,550 |
| SPARK EDUCATION | $151,120 |
| REP COMMUNITY PARTNERS LLC | $125,300 |
| ONEMINNESOTAORG | $99,733 |
| BELIEVE IN WHAT'S POSSIBLE | $97,620 |
| MEMORIALIZE THE MOVEMENT | $95,068 |
| MINNESOTANS FOR THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY | $94,749 |
| AFGHAN CULTURAL SOCIETY | $74,326 |
| HOPE HEALTH AND HOUSING | $65,000 |
| ADVANCEMENT OF HMONG AMERICANS | $60,243 |
| TIBYAN COMMUNITY CENTER | $58,617 |
| YOUTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE | $56,767 |
| URBAN VILLAGE THE | $56,704 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
159 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 103 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCoalition of Asian American Leaders5× · 2017–2023 · $811k · revenue +458% · 43% of their budget
- RTREVIVING THE ISLAMIC SISTERHOOD FOR8× · 2017–2024 · $768k · revenue +426% · 39% of their budget
- SFSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS5× · 2019–2025 · $544k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- FPFIRST PEOPLES FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +52%
- NFNONPROFIT FINANCIAL COMMONSone grant, 2024 · $339k · 53% of their budget
- HHOURCARgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $287k · revenue +295%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
Mixed Blood Theatre Company uses theater to disrupt injustice. We are a social justice organization catalyzing action and change through art. Our work is guided by deep community engagement and rooted in radical hospitality.
Wonderlust Productions is a multicultural, multi-disciplinary arts ensemble that illuminates a community's story through performance, mixing community members from across generations, ethnicities, and perspectives, alongside an ensemble of…
Nexus' mission is to build more engaged and powerful communities by supporting community building initiatives that expand community wealth and foster social and human capital.
Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
Promote civic engagement by the African American community in Minneapolis, MN and surrounding communities. The goal of Lights On is to create a sense of agency within the community by educating members about the institutions that affect…
TO Promote the health and well being of African refugee and immigrant women and their families in the twin City area through research, education ,advocacy and programming
MAS activates and strengthens communities through art, raising awareness of the history and cultural contributions of Black Latinos for social change and racial equity.
Our mission is to build Black philanthropic power to strengthen the ecosystem of Black-led social, political, and economic change in Minnesota and beyond.
Our mission is to cultivate, foster and implement sustainable and long-lasting change through Economic Development, Capacity Building, Technical Assistance, Job Training & Career Development, Mental Health initiatives, Memory Loss and…
Services provided include education, community development, youth programs, employment assistance, information dissemination, health and wellness programs, elder services, and child welfare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Advocacy and Community Empowerment Through Research and the most unlike its peers is Big Dreamers United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 27% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
252 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 252 of the 315 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRIDGEMAKERS ↗
- Who funds THE COUNCIL FOR BLACK MALE SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds QUALITY EDUCATION SERVICES OF MN INC ↗
- Who funds Coalition of Asian American Leaders ↗
- Who funds REVIVING THE ISLAMIC SISTERHOOD FOR ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds PENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds RACING MAGPIE ↗
- Who funds BREAK THE SILENCE ↗
- Who funds FIRST PEOPLES FUND ↗
- Who funds Foster Advocates ↗
- Who funds MARKET ENTRY FUND THE ↗
- Who funds NEW NATIVE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds THEATER MU INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Tanka Fund ↗
- Who funds TEATRO DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA INDIGENOUS BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT FINANCIAL COMMONS ↗
- Who funds Memorialize the Movement ↗
- Who funds Pangea World Theater ↗
- Who funds YOUTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HOURCAR ↗
- Who funds Hmong Early Childhood Coalition ↗
- Who funds GOOD TROUBLE ↗
- Who funds AYADA LEADS ↗
- Who funds MONARCH JOINT VENTURE ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTANS FOR THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY MACS ↗
- Who funds Indigenous Roots ↗
- Who funds PROJECT IMPRINTZ ↗
- Who funds ZTP ↗
- Who funds CLOSEKNIT ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR BLACK ECONOMIC POWER ↗
- Who funds LITERACY MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA EDUCATION EQUITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds MANIDOO OGITIGAAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fr Bigelow Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Minnesota Humanities Center · Youthprise · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Target Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Bush Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Propel Nonprofits funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.