Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Spicola Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2021
19
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Spicola Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Communitygiving, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Spicola Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $21k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’17
18
’18
17
’19
14
’20
16
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.

Philanthropy$414kFood & Nutrition$27kAnimals$10kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$9kCrime & Legal$9kEnvironment$9kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2021 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH COUNTRY FOOD ALLIANCE$2,000
NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE$2,000
MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN$1,750
CASA OF ORANGE COUNTY$1,750
FIND FOOD BANK$1,750
GULL LAKE SAILING SCHOOL$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$1,000
BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY$1,000
LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF$1,000
ICA FOOD SHELF$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
LAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION$875
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN DIEGUITO$875
HEARTLAND ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Lakes Area Food Shelf Inc: $2k → 14%The Grateful Garment Project: $2k → 8%ICA FOOD SHELF: $1k → 11%MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN: $2k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $1k → 11%MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN: $2k → 11%Lakes Area Food Shelf Inc: $2k → 11%Lakes Area Food Shelf Inc: $2k → 11%LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $2k → 11%OPEN ARMS: $1k → 11%Open Arms of Minnesota: $1k → 11%Open Arms of Minnesota: $1k → 11%Open Arms of Minnesota: $1k → 11%LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$84k · 22 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2021, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$84k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+9%

Still filing today

91%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF
    5× · 2017–2021 · $9k · revenue +368%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +105%
  • GC
    GULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • TG
    The Grateful Garment Project
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +5%
  • BF
    Berkeley Food Pantry
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
3
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
4
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
7
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
8
Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…

—
9
Minnesota Grocers Association

The minnesota grocers association advances the common interest of those engaged in all aspects of the food industry of mn as a leadership resource. the mga encourages and sponsors educational seminars, conventions and fosters the exchange…

—
10
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
11
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
12
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communitygiving and the most unlike its peers is The Babinski Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr12%46%35–55yr12%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr18%34%20–35yr12%35%35–55yr12%30%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
6,225/43,646

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
27/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $136,744 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $136,744 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITYGIVING — $136,744 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITYGIVINGLAKES AREA FOOD SHELF — $9,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $4,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesThe Grateful Garment Project — $1,588 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesGuild — $3,100 · OtherTHE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherSKI GULL INC — $2,500 · OtherBRIDGEWAY ACADEMY — $2,000 · OtherLAKESHORE CONSERVATION CLUB INC — $1,750 · OtherBerkeley Food Pantry — $1,525 · OtherTHE GULL LAKE SAILING SCHOOL — $1,500 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $5,225 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $4,169 · OtherHEARTLAND ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM — $3,350 · OtherUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION INC — $2,250 · OtherNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE — $2,000 · Other+10 more — $7,400 · OtherGULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $4,170 · EnvironmentBear Yuba Land Trust — $3,542 · EnvironmentNORTH COUNTRY FOOD ALLIANCE — $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $3,500 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Nevada County — $1,954 · Food & NutritionLAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterNevada County Habitat For Humanity — $3,679 · Housing & ShelterUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $6,350 · Education
Philanthropy$410,232Human Services$20,588Other$39,269Environment$13,712Food & Nutrition$10,454Housing & Shelter$9,679Education$6,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $136,744 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $136,744 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITYGIVING — $136,744 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKES AREA FOOD SHELF — $9,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $6,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $5,225 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $4,170 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $4,169 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNevada County Habitat For Humanity — $3,679 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBear Yuba Land Trust — $3,542 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM — $3,350 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGuild — $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSKI GULL INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of Nevada County — $1,954 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKESHORE CONSERVATION CLUB INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Grateful Garment Project — $1,588 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GULL LAKE SAILING SCHOOL — $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MINNESOTA — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cookie Cart — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesot…Otto Bremer TrustCommunitygivingThe Minneapolis Found…Mightycause Charitabl…Minnesota Community F…Initiative FoundationLand O'Lakes Foundati…The Richard M Schulze…Xcel Energy FoundationUnited Way WorldwideThe Blackbaud Giving …
Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Communitygiving · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · Initiative Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Spicola Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines