Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sozosei Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Health$15MPhilanthropy$2.6MCrime & Legal$1.8MArts & Culture$1.6MCivil Rights$838kEducation$772kPublic Safety & Disaster$635kFood & Nutrition$555kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.5M
$92,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC$215,000
JUDGE DAVID L BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW$100,000
FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC$100,000
NATIONAL HOMELESS LAW CENTER$100,000
1 MILLION MADLY MOTIVATED MOMS INC$100,000
INSEPARABLE INC$100,000
LEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC$100,000
INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF NEUROETHICS AND NEUROSCIENCE$100,000
DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE$100,000
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$92,000
TIDES CENTER$92,000
NAMI NATIONAL$50,000
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC$50,000
TRADEOFFS INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $362k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE AUSTIN AREA URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 10%NAMI Washington: $30k → 9%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $13k → 16%TRINITY COUNSELING SERVICES: $5k → 11%One Voice: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $22k → 19%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS ITS CONSTITUENT CHAPTERS AND BRANCHES: $100k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $92k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 39 repeat orgs$8.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
107

Total granted

$15M
$8.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+16%

Still filing today

77%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $367k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $850k · revenue +59%
  • NN
    NAMI National
    5× · 2020–2025 · $825k · revenue +274%
  • II
    Inseparable Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $655k · revenue +389%

Funded once

  • MF
    MIAMI FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue +218%
  • LM
    LEMONADA MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $300k
  • CF
    Corp for Support housing & Access Mental Health
    one grant, 2022 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
2
Mentis

Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.

Human Services
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
5
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
6
Social Current Inc

Social current's mission as developed and approved by its board of directors is to advocate for and implement equitable solutions to society's toughest challenges through collaboration, innovation, policy, and practice excellence.

Human Services
7
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
8
Mind Share Partners

The mission of mind share partners is to build awareness, support, and acceptance for people with mental health conditions.

Human Services
9
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Access Inc and the most unlike its peers is Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Military Veterans SupportYouth Development ServicesCommunity Food PantriesAffordable Housing Construc…Health Access Advocacy and …Public Library OperationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community FoundationsAddiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/104
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,461

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
102/102
Grantees still filing
63/102
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE KENNEDY FORUM — $500,000 · OtherInternational Documentary Foundation Inc — $400,000 · OtherRecovery Innovations Inc dba RI International — $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $400,000 · OtherThe Path Forward — $350,000 · OtherThe Rand Corporation — $419,915 · Other+93 more — $7,739,600 · Other+93 moreONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY — $900,000 · HealthONEFIFTEEN RECOVERYMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $850,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTI…NAMI National — $825,000 · HealthNAMI NationalYOUTHCAST MEDIA GROUP INC — $750,000 · HealthYOUTHCAST MEDIA GROUP INCInseparable Inc — $655,000 · HealthInseparable IncRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $455,000 · HealthRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYG…DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE — $400,000 · HealthMIAMI FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC — $400,000 · HealthCamden Coalition Inc — $355,000 · HealthSound Mind Live Inc — $300,000 · HealthAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $280,000 · Health+14 more — $1,444,000 · Health+14 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMU…FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC — $400,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION …SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $333,367 · PhilanthropySAN JOAQUIN…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $333,367 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY F…BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $249,967 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE C…THE MARGARET CLARK MORGAN FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MARGARE…VETERAN ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyVETERAN ADV…NORTHERN NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $107,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTRADEOFFS INC — $500,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $480,000 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC — $400,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $200,000 · EducationNew York University — $92,000 · Education+3 more — $57,500 · EducationTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC — $450,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $325,000 · Arts & CultureFRANKLINTON ARTS DISTRICT — $100,000 · Arts & CultureWave Pool Corp — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $131,000 · Arts & CultureLEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $650,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS — $150,000 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $110,000 · Crime & LegalMEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCEINC — $100,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $30,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC — $700,000 · Civil Rights1 Million Madly Motivated Moms — $200,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $100,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$10,209,515Health$7,614,000Philanthropy$2,649,201Education$1,729,500Arts & Culture$1,106,000Crime & Legal$1,040,000Civil Rights$1,025,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY — $900,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $850,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNAMI National — $825,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTHCAST MEDIA GROUP INC — $750,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC — $700,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetInseparable Inc — $655,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetLEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $650,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTRADEOFFS INC — $500,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $480,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $455,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC — $450,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $419,915 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE — $400,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC — $400,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC — $400,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCamden Coalition Inc — $355,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $333,367 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $333,367 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $325,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSound Mind Live Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $280,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $249,967 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLACK MEN HEAL — $210,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $200,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budget1 Million Madly Motivated Moms — $200,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetTHE MARGARET CLARK MORGAN FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetJUDGE DAVID L BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW — $200,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetVETERAN ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $200,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetADVOCATE PROGRAM INC — $175,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $167,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $150,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $110,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHERN NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $107,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Mercer County Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetFRANKLINTON ARTS DISTRICT — $100,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCEINC — $100,000 over 3y, 43% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCAST MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Inseparable Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRADEOFFS INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds Camden Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Sound Mind Live Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Annie E Casey Foundat…The Pew Charitable Tr…East Bay Community Fo…Van Ameringen Foundat…Bristol-Myers Squibb …The Robert Wood Johns…Laura and John Arnold…Princeton Area Commun…The Commonwealth FundCalifornia Healthcare…Foundation to Promote…Community Foundation …
Annie E Casey Foundation IncMD22.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts · East Bay Community Foundation · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Laura and John Arnold Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Commonwealth Fund · California Healthcare Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Community Foundation of New Jersey

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sozosei Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Advocate Program Inc — 60% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Greater Baltimore Cultural Alliance Inc — 5% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Raritan Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sozosei Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sozosei Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines