Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Southern Imagination Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$166kScience & Tech$82kHuman Services$70kReligion$55kFood & Nutrition$48kInternational$37kEnvironment$33kArts & Culture$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$426k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRESH AIR FAMILY$20,000
UNITED WAY$15,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$6,000
SURFERS HEALING FOLLY BEACH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$5,000
ROCK N ROLL RESCUE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Y2O - YOUTH TO OCEAN$2,000
BIRMINGHAM ZOO$1,667
WOODLAWN UNITED$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PUYALLUP FOOD BANK: $10k → 9%TEACHER'S SUPPLY CLOSET: $2k → 12%THE LOVELADY CENTER: $1k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $10k → 16%FRESH AIR FAMILY: $20k → 16%CHILDCARE RESOURCES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$394k · 12 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
37

Total granted

$394k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+23%

Still filing today

75%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $103k · revenue +41%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $37k · revenue +163%
  • MR
    MEDIA REFORM SC LLC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • PV
    PUYALLUP VALLEY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • PF
    PUYALLUP FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • UM
    Urban Ministry Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals
2
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
3
Feeding the Carolinas

The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
A Hand Up Ministries

Our mission is to see communities transformed by the Gospel through loving, serving, sharing, and sending. We accomplish this mission through local partnership, training, and service opportunities while advocating and empowering…

Religion
5
Food Bank of Greenwood County

The mission of the food bank of greenwood county is to reduce hunger through community cooperation, effectively distributing donated grocery products and perishable foods, and making the best possible use of all available resources.

Food & Nutrition
6
Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank

Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.

7
Second Chance Foods Inc

Second Chance Foods (SCF or the Organization) is dedicated to reducing food waste by rescuing food that would otherwise be discarded, reducing hunger on a local basis while elevating the health of those served by the program, and reducing…

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Community Kitchen Inc of Myrtle Beach

The mission is to feed the hungry and eliminate hunger in our community. last year, we fed over 101,000 adults in our general feeding program and nourished 32,644 children in our childrens hunger initiative program (chip). every person who…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food for Little Rascals Inc

Food for Little Rascals Inc (FFLR) is operated exclusively to improve the health, welfare, and care of children in the State of South Carolina.

11
Children's Museum of the Lowcountry

The Museum is a non-profit organization whose mission is to spark imagination, stimulate curiosity and encourage problem solving through the power of play in families from all backgrounds with young children.

Arts & Culture
12
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Going Places and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%8%<5yr16%4%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%2%<5yr16%1%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr13%50%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
15%
975/6,571

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT — $55,068 · OtherCATHEDRAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENTYWCA — $55,000 · OtherYWCAPUYALLUP VALLEY FOOD BANK — $25,000 · OtherPUYALLUP VALLEY FOOD BANKWOODLAWN UNITED INC — $9,500 · Other+34 more — $121,434 · Other+34 moreUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $103,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL AL…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM — $32,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION…PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC SCIENCE CE…MEDIA REFORM SC LLC — $22,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA REFORM SC LL…+2 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureFRESH AIR FAMILY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesPUYALLUP FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Human ServicesUrban Ministry Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesI GOT LEGS — $4,500 · Human ServicesTEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET — $2,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $37,000 · ReligionCHARLESTON WATERKEEPER — $12,500 · EnvironmentGreen Heart Project Inc — $2,000 · EnvironmentTURN90 — $9,500 · Crime & LegalDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC — $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$266,002Philanthropy$135,000Arts & Culture$100,000Human Services$48,500Religion$37,000Environment$14,500Crime & Legal$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $103,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM — $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA REFORM SC LLC — $22,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetFRESH AIR FAMILY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCHARLESTON WATERKEEPER — $12,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPUYALLUP FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUrban Ministry Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTURN90 — $9,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWOODLAWN UNITED INC — $9,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBirmingham Zoo Inc — $6,834 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRock n Roll Rescue — $5,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR SURF FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetQUEST IN RECOVERY — $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHEALING FARM MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLowcountry Local First — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreen Heart Project Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWindwood Farm Home For Children Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEnough Pie — $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMOR HEALING KITCHEN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOne-Eighty Place — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMCWANE SCIENCE CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDCARE RESOURCES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM RAIN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM
  • Who funds MEDIA REFORM SC LLC
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FAMILY INC
  • Who funds CHARLESTON WATERKEEPER
  • Who funds PUYALLUP FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Urban Ministry Inc
  • Who funds TURN90
  • Who funds WOODLAWN UNITED INC
  • Who funds Birmingham Zoo Inc
  • Who funds Rock n Roll Rescue
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds WARRIOR SURF FOUNDATION
  • Who funds QUEST IN RECOVERY
  • Who funds HEALING FARM MINISTRIES
  • Who funds I GOT LEGS
  • Who funds GOING PLACES
  • Who funds RED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Lowcountry Local First
  • Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC
  • Who funds Green Heart Project Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joanna FoundationSC28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joanna Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Protective Life Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Harold M Henderson Benevolent Fund · Nall-Whatley Foundation · Arlington Partners Charitable Foundation Inc · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southern Imagination Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph