Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

South Carolina Association for Community Economic Development

Through our network of members and partner organizations, SCACED strives to improve the quality of life for low-wealth families and communities by advancing community economic development and public policy in South Carolina.

$659k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$1.4MHousing & Shelter$805kHuman Services$571kEducation$235kCrime & Legal$71kFood & Nutrition$25kArts & Culture$24kReligion$20kEmployment$10kOther$1.4M
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $435,850 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $659,041 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $223,191 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $272k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Gullah Farmers Cooperative Association$142,500
CLIMB Fund$71,000
Increasing Hope$58,000
Lincoln Preservation and Historical Society$23,600
Homes of Hope$20,750
The Smart Box$10,000
Session Farm LLC$10,000
Ross Family Farm LLC$10,000
South Carolina Empowerment Centre$10,000
Natramedics LLC$10,000
Saxmore Farms LLC$10,000
BlacQuity SC$7,500
Latino Community Development$7,500
Genesis Homes$7,500
Catalyst Community Development Corporation$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $541k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Grace Impact Dev Center: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $61k → 11%ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY WELLNESS ACADEMY: $45k → 17%THE GRACE IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8k → 9%East Cooper Community Outreac: $15k → 12%East Cooper Community Outreac: $10k → 12%East Cooper Community Outreac: $8k → 12%PRIME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $8k → 15%Mill Community Ministries: $10k → 10%INCREASING HOPE: $141k → 12%INCREASING HOPE: $114k → 12%Increasing Hope: $58k → 12%THE OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $20k → 12%Neighbors Together: $8k → 12%Palmetto CAP: $10k → 12%MICAH PROGRAM INC: $8k → 10%Palmetto CAP: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 29 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
51

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+3%

Still filing today

83%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CLIMB Fund
    3× · 2022–2024 · $453k · revenue +10%
  • IH
    Increasing HOPE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $343k · revenue +434%
  • CI
    COMMUNITYWORKS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $238k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY CAPITAL ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $336k · revenue -40% · 50% of their budget
  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2023 · $165k
  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2022 · $125k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colleton County Fuller Center for Housing Inc

Collleton Fuller Center work in partenrship with God and People everywhere from all walks of life to develope decent communities. We will establish collaborate efforts with any and all agencies and individuals who can play a role in…

—
2
Habitat for Humanity of Berkeley County

Habitat for Humanity of Berkeley County (HFHBC) is a community-level Habitat for Humanity organization that acts in partnership with and on behalf of Habitat for Humanity International. HFHBC seeks to put Gods love into action by brings…

—
3
Sumter Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

Housing & Shelter
4
Tri County Regional Development Corporation

To study the characteristics and market trends in relation to economic housing issues within the Waccamaw housing services to special needs population.

Housing & Shelter
5
Bridge North Charleston

None

Housing & Shelter
6
Black Economic Mobility Coalition

Identify and develop talent to increase the number of sustainable Black-owned business in the Upstate

Community Improvement
7
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
8
Housing Development Corporation of Rock Hill

The organization helps low and moderate income persons become homeowners by buying homes, selling them to income-qualified buyers and reusing sales proceeds to build more homes. the organization also conducts pre-purchase financial…

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
10
Charleston Hispanic Association
Community Improvement
11
Housing Hub

Building homes working families can afford. We are dedicated to: providing new, affordable homes to residents in the South Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee; preparing future and current homeowners to both acquire and maintain a safe and…

Housing & Shelter
12
Beyond Housing

We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Greenville County Sc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smart Box. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Family Philanthropic Founda…Community Health CentersChristian Missionary Minist…Charter and Independent Sch…Christian Youth Development…Child Welfare & Family Serv…Member Recreation ClubsBasic Needs & Community Sup…Professional Trade Associat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%11%<5yr15%18%5–10yr18%29%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr18%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%2%<5yr15%26%5–10yr18%25%10–20yr14%37%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr18%7%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/89
the rest of the field
14%
1,803/12,918

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/56
Grantees still filing
38/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OPTUS BANK — $239,583 · OtherOPTUS BANKDESA INC — $232,318 · OtherDESA INCUSC School of Medicine Greenville — $191,261 · OtherUSC School of Medicine GreenvilleThe Gullah Farmers Cooperative Association — $162,500 · OtherThe Gullah Farmers Cooperative Assoc…SOUTH CAROLINA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $125,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF C…TRINITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING — $81,540 · OtherTRINITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSINGTOWN OF ANDREWS COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $59,000 · Other+33 more — $394,377 · Other+33 moreCLIMB Fund — $453,376 · Community ImprovementCLIMB FundSOUTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY CAPITAL ALLIANCE — $336,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY CAPITAL A…ALLENDALE COUNTY ALIVE — $170,174 · Community ImprovementALLENDALE COUNTY ALIVESOUTH CAROLINA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $164,835 · Community ImprovementSOUTH CAROLINA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF…SC UPLIFT COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $51,500 · Community ImprovementBEAUFORT COUNTY BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $50,000 · Community Improvement+11 more — $161,824 · Community Improvement+11 moreCOMMUNITYWORKS INC — $237,763 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITYWORKS INCSantee Lynches Affordable Housing and Community Development Corporat — $136,588 · Housing & ShelterSantee Lynches Affo…SOUTHEASTERN HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $94,992 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHEASTERN HOUSIN…I58 INC — $83,358 · Housing & ShelterI58 INCCalvary Life Inspirations Comm Dev Corp — $72,000 · Housing & ShelterCalvary Life Inspir…HOMES OF HOPE INC — $70,750 · Housing & ShelterHOMES OF HOPE INC+8 more — $109,750 · Housing & Shelter+8 moreIncreasing HOPE — $343,077 · Human ServicesIncreasing HOP…COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $60,812 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESO…NANCYS COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $45,494 · Human ServicesNANCYS COMMUNI…East Cooper Community Outreach — $33,556 · Human ServicesEast Cooper Co…ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER — $20,025 · Human Services+6 more — $68,000 · Human Services+6 moreBENEDICT COLLEGE — $196,394 · EducationA Father's Place — $21,000 · EducationSMART BOX — $17,500 · EducationCAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT — $32,300 · Crime & LegalSOTERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $31,000 · Crime & LegalLOWCOUNTRY LEGAL VOLUNTEERS — $7,500 · Crime & LegalHUB CITY ROOTS — $15,000 · Food & NutritionFRESH FUTURE FARM INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,485,579Community Improvement$1,387,709Housing & Shelter$805,201Human Services$570,964Education$234,894Crime & Legal$70,800Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLIMB Fund — $453,376 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetIncreasing HOPE — $343,077 over 5y, 22% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY CAPITAL ALLIANCE — $336,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetCOMMUNITYWORKS INC — $237,763 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBENEDICT COLLEGE — $196,394 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALLENDALE COUNTY ALIVE — $170,174 over 3y, 79% of budgetSantee Lynches Affordable Housing and Community Development Corporat — $136,588 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $94,992 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetI58 INC — $83,358 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetCalvary Life Inspirations Comm Dev Corp — $72,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE INC — $70,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSC UPLIFT COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $51,500 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetBEAUFORT COUNTY BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $50,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetNANCYS COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $45,494 over 1y, 11% of budgetEast Cooper Community Outreach — $33,556 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY UPLIFTING ALLIANCE PROJECT — $32,768 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT — $32,300 over 2y, 11% of budgetSOTERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $31,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTHERN CAROLINA REGIONAL - CDC — $28,306 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLincolnville Preservation & Historical Society Inc — $23,600 over 1y, 45% of budgetLIMITLESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $23,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetA Father's Place — $21,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetREBUILD UPSTATE — $20,444 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER — $20,025 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetMIDLANDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHARLESTON COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMART BOX — $17,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFIRST IMPRESSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $17,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetGRACE IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $17,500 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA EMPOWERMENT CENTRE — $16,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetGenesis Homes Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHUB CITY ROOTS — $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSumter County Community Development Corporation — $13,750 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSTEP BY STEP MINISTRY HOPE PROJECT INCORPORATED — $11,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHomeless No More Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRESH FUTURE FARM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSUSTAINING WAY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Community Self-Help — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGreen Heart Project Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHARLESTON CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCharleston Redevelopment Corporation — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNeighbors Together Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPRIME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $7,500 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetBlacquity SC — $7,500 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST LAND TRUST — $7,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCharity Foundation — $7,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LEGAL VOLUNTEERS — $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Comm…Coastal Community Fou…United Way of Greenvi…The Jolley FoundationSisters of Charity Fo…Truist Foundation IncTd Charitable Foundat…United Community Bank…Hollingsworth Funds I…Wells Fargo FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Scansource Charitable…
Central Carolina Community FoundationSC47.1× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · United Way of Greenville County Inc · The Jolley Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Truist Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · United Community Bank Foundation · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization South Carolina Association for Community Economic Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines