Skip to content
Soteria Innovative Solutions at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Soteria Innovative Solutions

The purpose of rescue america is to combat human sex trafficking.

$242k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$111kHuman Services$38kHousing & Shelter$20kCrime & Legal$11kReligion$11k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $79,350, the rows itemized in this filing. The $241,971 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $162,621 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$9,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFE PLACES FOR WOMEN INC$25,250
HOOKERS FOR JESUS$12,500
FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL$12,250
CREATED WOMEN$9,500
REHOPE$7,500
HARRIETT'S HOUSE$6,850
RESTORED HOPE MINISTRIES$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%RESTORED HOPE MINISTRIES: $6k → 14%SAFE PLACES FOR WOMEN INC: $25k → 8%HOOKERS FOR JESUS: $13k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NV
CO
MO
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
2
HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc

Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.

Human Services
3
Rubies Womens Group Inc

House women with trauma, addiction

Religion
4
Rescue Hill Nazarene Compassionate Ministry Center

Rescue Hill helps survivors of human trafficking with recovery services and resources in a safe environment. Rescue Hill offers a stabilization home for survivors and their small children as well as advocacy services.

Human Services
5
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
6
Sojourn House Inc

Sojourn House exists to defend, restore, and liberate women who have been trafficked or exploited.

Human Services
7
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
8
The Bridge 2 Home

The bridge 2 home is a safe and loving home for young girls and young women who were victimized by sex trafficking. at the bridge they can find healing and growth and can experience the love of a perfect heavenly father who pursues them.

Human Services
9
Mission 89 Inc

Fight human trafficking

—
10
Selah Life Choices Inc

We exist to serve women who have been trafficked. through our confidential services, we offer a safe space for healing to begin while we compassionately reflect jesus to all we encounter.

Human Services
11
Home for Homeless Women
—
12
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hookers for Jesus; the most unlike its peers is Cornelius Connection International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $70,800 · ReligionFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INCCornelius Connection International: $10,900 · ReligionCornelius Connection InternationalSAFE PLACES FOR WOMEN: $25,250 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACES FOR WOMENHOOKERS FOR JESUS: $12,500 · Human ServicesHOOKERS FOR JESUSRestored Hope Ministries Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesRestored Hope Ministries …HARRIETS HOUSE: $12,700 · Housing & ShelterHARRIETS HOU…RESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterRESTORATION …LOVE PEOPLE NOT PIXELS INC: $20,000 · HealthLOVE PEOPLE…OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES: $14,407 · OtherThe Her Campaign: $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Religion$81,700Human Services$43,250Housing & Shelter$20,200Health$20,000Other$14,407Crime & Legal$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $70,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE PLACES FOR WOMEN: $25,250 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLOVE PEOPLE NOT PIXELS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHARRIETS HOUSE: $12,700 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHOOKERS FOR JESUS: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Her Campaign: $11,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetRESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRestored Hope Ministries Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Safe House Project IncNatl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Safe House Project IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Safe House Project Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Soteria Innovative Solutions funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Soteria Innovative Solutions. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Soteria Innovative Solutions?

    Find your warmest path to Soteria Innovative Solutions through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Soteria Innovative Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home