Skip to content

· Private foundation

Solo Deo

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$83kReligion$56kHuman Services$32kRecreation & Sports$18kCivil Rights$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kEducation$6kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,300
Median grant
5
States reached
$644k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TWIN LAKES CHURCH$11,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
UNIVERSITY COVENANT CHURCH$3,000
RAFIKI FOUNDATION$3,000
WORLD VISION$2,000
UC REGENTS UC DAVIS - ATHLETES IN ACTION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,700
MERCY SHIPS$1,500
EQUAL JUSTICE INIATIVE$1,300
A PRIMALLY PLAYFUL FOUNDATION$1,000
EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS - GOLD COUNTRY REGION$750
YOLO FOOD BANK$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SACRAMENTO$500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
MO
KS
SC
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 34% of Solo Deo’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 38%.

Solo Deolessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 27 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$203k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+1%

Still filing today

33%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAFIKI FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +27%
  • EN
    EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +98%
  • Mercy Ships International
    6× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAKESIDE CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +180%
  • MS
    MISSION SPRINGS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
4
UniversalGiving

Our mission is to connect people to quality giving and volunteer opportunities worldwide. universalgiving is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteering are a natural part of everyday…

Philanthropy
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
7
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
8
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
9
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
10
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
11
Worldreaderorg

Worldreader is a global tech nonprofit, providing award-winning free-digital reading app, booksmart, to help families prepare young children for learning, by fostering reading routines-a proven formula to build school-readiness and…

International
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bulldog Club of America Rescue Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TWIN LAKES CHURCH: $26,740 · OtherTWIN LAKES CHURCHUNIVERSITY COVENANT CHURCH: $19,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY COVENANT CHURCHUC REGENTS UC DAVIS - ATHLETES IN ACTION: $15,000 · OtherUC REGENTS UC DAVIS - ATHLETES IN ACTIONIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEQUAL JUSTICE INIATIVE: $9,773 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INIATIVEIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS - GOLD COUNTRY REGION: $7,107 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - GOLD COUNTRY REGIONLAKESIDE CHURCH: $5,000 · Other+23 more: $27,743 · Other+23 moreRAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $29,102 · InternationalRAFIKI FOUNDATION INCWORLD VISION INC: $19,315 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCMercy Ships International: $15,166 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $13,200 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION+3 more: $3,500 · InternationalEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $17,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesA PRIMALLY PLAYFUL FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationYOLO COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,800 · EducationTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $2,000 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $1,000 · AnimalsBULLDOG CLUB OF AMERICA RESCUE NETWORK INC: $1,000 · Animals3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EmploymentPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $500 · Health
Other$131,363International$80,283Human Services$18,500Education$5,300Animals$4,000Employment$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $29,102 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $19,315 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $17,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Ships International: $15,166 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $13,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOLO COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento Inc: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS: $445 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAFIKI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds A PRIMALLY PLAYFUL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
  • Who funds YOLO COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento Inc ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds 3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BULLDOG CLUB OF AMERICA RESCUE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solo Deo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solo Deo. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Solo Deo?

Find your warmest path to Solo Deo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Solo Deo’s filings →

More from the funding graph