Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sollie Emmitt McCreless & Lilla Marr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$590kEducation$250kInternational$32kRecreation & Sports$25kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $77k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$30,000
ASBURY UNIVERSITY$20,000
EDIFY$15,000
RELIANT MISSION$12,000
A FOUNDATION OF THEOLOGICAL EDUCATI$5,000
WORLD LINK MINISTRIES$3,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$2,400
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RANSOMED LIFE INC: $2k → 16%RANSOMED LIFE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
OR
IN
KY
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Sollie Emmitt McCreless & Lilla Marr’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Sollie Emmitt McCreless & Lilla Marrlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$854k · 16 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$854k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $293k · revenue +106%
  • AC
    ASBURY COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $227k · revenue +17%
  • CH
    Christian Health Service Corps Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • AF
    A FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCAT
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • GN
    GOOD NEWS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -50%
  • OM
    ONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
2
Angleton Christian School

The mission of the school is to provide the students of acs with quality, god-centered education; training children in the way they should go, equipping students to glorify god by being a witness for jesus christ to the world through a…

Education
3
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
4
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
5
American Baptist Theological Seminary dba American Baptist College

Is to provide educational opportunities for gifted students who have limited academic experiences and resources but unlimited potential for leadership in society.

Education
6
Southwestern Christian College

Its purpose is to offer a holistic educational program that will motivate the student to value and achieve academi excellence within the context of commitment to moral and spiritual values.

Education
7
Wesley Biblical Seminary

Wesley biblical seminary is a multi-denominational school of theology that provides undergraduate, graduate and doctorate level education for individuals who are preparing for christian service.

Education
8
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
9
God's Bible School College & Missionary Training Home

God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…

Education
10
Luther Rice College & Seminary Inc

The mission of Luther Rice College & Seminary is to serve the church and community by providing biblically based on-campus and distance education to Christian men and women for ministry and the marketplace with an end to granting…

—
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
12
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify; the most unlike its peers is Kor Education School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $292,500 · EducationASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYASBURY COLLEGE: $226,500 · EducationASBURY COLLEGE+2 more: $9,000 · EducationRELIANT MISSION INC: $78,000 · OtherRELIANT MISSION INCPERKINS SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY SMU: $52,500 · OtherPERKINS SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY SMUA FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION: $49,000 · OtherA FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATIONFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $25,200 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $21,600 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTUNIVERSITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherTHE MISSION SOCIETY: $10,500 · Other+13 more: $58,757 · Other+13 moreChristian Health Service Corps Inc: $30,000 · InternationalEdify: $25,000 · InternationalRANSOMED LIFE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesWORLD LINK MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 · Religion
Education$528,000Other$311,557International$55,000Human Services$4,000Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $292,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $226,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEdify: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAchievers Center for Education: $7,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGOOD NEWS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetVILLAGE MISSIONS: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOR EDUCATION SCHOOL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRANSOMED LIFE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD LINK MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Christian Health Service Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗
  • Who funds Achievers Center for Education ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KOR EDUCATION SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RANSOMED LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD LINK MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sollie Emmitt McCreless & Lilla Marr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sollie Emmitt McCreless & Lilla Marr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sollie Emmitt McCreless & Lilla Marr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph