· Public charity
Solano County Private Industry Council Inc
The mission of the Workforce Development Board of Solano County is to provide placement, training services to improve the quality, competitiveness and productivity of the workforce in Solano county
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $2,398,870 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,845,746 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,446,876 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $197k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+1 grant · $293k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mission Samoa | $292,579 |
| The Uncuffed Project | $247,073 |
| Center for Urban Excellence | $195,823 |
| County of Sonoma | $177,726 |
| CAMINAR | $177,241 |
| Center for Employment Opportunities Inc | $142,721 |
| California Human Development Corp | $136,548 |
| LifeSpace Labs LLC | $117,678 |
| Club Stride Inc | $116,423 |
| First Place for Youth | $106,544 |
| Workforce Alliance of the North Bay | $91,999 |
| LIGHT CAST | $90,000 |
| Goodwill of San Francisco Bay | $82,725 |
| RDA Consulting SPC | $82,150 |
| REPRESENTED | $64,513 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCAMINAR3× · 2021–2025 · $420k · revenue +17%
- CFCENTER FOR URBAN EXELLENCE3× · 2023–2025 · $396k · revenue +78% · 30% of their budget
- FPFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH3× · 2023–2025 · $348k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- FFFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGESgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $604k · revenue +127%
- TSTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2024 · $129k · revenue +3%
- SFSOLANO FAMILY & CHILDRENS COUNCIL INCone grant, 2024 · $127k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
Cultivating individual and collective well-being, shared accountability, and healing through community-driven research and evidence-based restorative processes.
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…
Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.
The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Canal alliance has been the leading service provider and community advocate for marin's extremely low-income immigrant community for 39 years. each year, the organization collaborates with over 60 agencies and engages hundreds of…
Catholic charities of santa clara county serves and advocates for families and individuals in need, especially those living in poverty. rooted in gospel values, we work to create a more just and compassionate community in which people of…
Address the homeless crisis in California.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caminar and the most unlike its peers is Fairfield Police Activities League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds Mission Samoa Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMINAR ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN EXELLENCE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNCUFFED PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CLUB STRIDE INC ↗
- Who funds Goodwill of The San Francisco Bay ↗
- Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOLANO FAMILY & CHILDRENS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH FACILITIES ↗
- Who funds GLADEO ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Port ↗
- Who funds A Place-2-Live Inc ↗
- Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds SafeQuest Solano Inc ↗
- Who funds VASA Educational Services ↗
- Who funds FIGHTING BACK PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Solano Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Travis Credit Union · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · East Bay Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Solano County Private Industry Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.