Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$536kEducation$520kHousing & Shelter$23kHuman Services$13kHealth$12kCivil Rights$10kFood & Nutrition$10kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE$70,650
TEMPLE ADATH B'NAI ISRAEL$70,650
COMMITTEE TO PROMOTE RESPECT IN$5,000
ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC$1,500
UNITED CARING SERVICES$1,500
AURORA INC$1,500
TRI-STATE FOOD BANK$1,500
FEED EVANSVILLE INC$1,000
IMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE: $1k → 15%AURORA INC: $4k → 15%AURORA INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+5%

Still filing today

46%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TRI-STATE FOOD BANK
    6× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +128%
  • BK
    Brothers Keeper Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +27%
  • CE
    CHURCHES EMBRACING OFFENDERS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • IE
    IMPACT EVANSVILLE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emergency Shelter of Northern Ky Inc

To provide emergency shelter which is life saving and transitional housing for those seeking to end homelessness. ESNKY is open to those who are homeless, stranded or without utilities. Seeking to provide a safe, secure environment…

Housing & Shelter
2
Unity Shelter

Providing safe shelter through collaborative care.

Human Services
3
Inner City Night Shelter Inc

A non-profit corporation that provides shelter for homeless men and women in savannah, georgia.

Housing & Shelter
4
Our Brothers Keeper Shelter

To provide shelter and a meal to those who are homeless in the Big Rapids area.

Housing & Shelter
5
United Community Ministries Inc

Providing food & shelter to the homeless and transitioning the homeless toward permanent independence in housing.

Human Services
6
Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc

Helping homeless men by providing a safe shelter and meeting their basic needs as well as address barriers related to homelessness and self-sufficiency and helping homeless men to obtain and maintain more appropriate housing.

—
7
Stepping Stone Shelter Inc

Provide food, lodging, and assistance for unemployed individuals while they are searching for work.

Housing & Shelter
8
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition
9
Welcome House Inc

Welcome house provides a continuum of services to end homelessness and promote stability for each person we serve.

Housing & Shelter
10
Every Shelter Inc

Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.

Education
11
Interfaith Partnership for the Homeless Inc

In recognition of the dignity and value of every human life, the mission of interfaith partnership for the homeless (iph) is to address the needs of the homeless and low-income community by providing a continuum of services to encourage…

Housing & Shelter
12
Share

Share believes every person counts. together we pursue a stronger community by building relationships, advocating for equitable access to housing and food stability while empowering every individual to grow and thrive.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-State Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Immigrant Welcome and Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ADATH B'NAI ISRAEL: $536,100 · OtherTEMPLE ADATH B'NAI ISRAELHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $516,500 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION+8 more: $33,150 · OtherALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesAURORA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesUnited Caring Shelters Inc: $10,500 · Housing & ShelterBrothers Keeper Inc: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterTRI-STATE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN: $3,450 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $1,000 · Education
Other$1,085,750Human Services$18,000Housing & Shelter$17,500Health$3,450Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Caring Shelters Inc: $10,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK: $7,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers Keeper Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAURORA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-STATE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN: $3,450 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCHURCHES EMBRACING OFFENDERS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetIMPACT EVANSVILLE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
  • Who funds AURORA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES EMBRACING OFFENDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family · Edward Love Foundation · Holiday Management Foundation · St Mary's Health Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Gerling Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?

    Find your warmest path to Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph