Skip to content
Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation

To perform and carry out such educational, scientific and charitable functions and purposes of the society for vascular surgery (svs) as may be delegated to the foundation.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MHealth$1.5MScience & Tech$362kRecreation & Sports$250kHuman Services$50k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $195,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $260,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$150,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Society for Vascular Surgery Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 15 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
23

Total granted

$2.5M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+23%

Still filing today

33%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $203k · revenue +76%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2022 · $162k · revenue +51%
  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $56k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • Northwestern Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +41%
  • PC
    PHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Trauma Research and Education Foundation of Fresno. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $336,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $300,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIASTATE OF WEST VIRGINIA: $275,000 · OtherSTATE OF WEST VIRGINIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $272,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $257,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC: $250,000 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $250,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $165,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDATHE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES: $150,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURESHEALTHCORE: $100,000 · Other+9 more: $186,000 · Other+9 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $203,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $162,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYEmory University: $56,000 · EducationEmory UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $55,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERS…The George Washington University: $50,000 · EducationThe George Washington U…Yale University: $47,000 · EducationYale UniversityBaylor College of Medicine: $45,449 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $32,500 · Education+4 more: $67,000 · Education+4 moreDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $150,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $25,000 · HealthDALLAS VA RESEARCH CORPORATION: $25,000 · HealthVETERANS HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $15,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $12,000 · HealthTrauma Research and Education Foundation of Fresno: $10,000 · HealthTHE VASCULAR INTERVENTIONAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · HealthSOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10,000 · HealthNorthwestern University: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Human Services
Other$2,741,500Education$867,949Health$282,000Recreation & Sports$250,000Human Services$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $203,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $162,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $150,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES: $150,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEmory University: $56,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe George Washington University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $47,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $45,449 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY: $37,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity Health Network: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS VA RESEARCH CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrauma Research and Education Foundation of Fresno: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE VASCULAR INTERVENTIONAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVascular Specialists Education Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yale UniversityRheumatology Research…Muscular Dystrophy As…The Children's Hospit…University of Pittsbu…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Yale UniversityCT15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yale University · Rheumatology Research Foundation · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · University of Pittsburgh · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • South Shore Health System Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Society for Vascular Surgery’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home