· Public charity
Soar4 Inc
Funded key organizations to advance specific outcomes while mobilizing community support and overseeing charitable initiatives for maximum community impact.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $153,051 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $173,001 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,950 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $78k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE OREGON SUMMER STAR | $17,500 |
| MARIE MILLS CENTER | $15,551 |
| ASSIST LEAGUE OF COLUMBIA PACIFIC | $13,000 |
| DAYTIME ENRICHMENT ACT & REC INC | $12,000 |
| GERMAINES CULINARY | $10,000 |
| OUR LADY QUEEN OF AFRICA | $10,000 |
| STONE SOUP CORVALLIS | $9,000 |
| MICHELLES LOVE | $9,000 |
| WE CARE | $8,000 |
| POTLUCK IN THE PARK | $6,500 |
| LIV WITH PURPOSE | $6,500 |
| RISING STARS | $6,000 |
| DAYTIME DROP IN CENTER | $5,000 |
| HARNEY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $5,000 |
| WITH LOVE OREGON | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Meals On Us is to provide nutritious and delicious meals, at no cost to individuals experiencing hunger and food insecurity within our community
Increase sustainable food security in South Corvallis by providing emergency food and supplies.
Prepare and deliver meals to the homes of older adults who are unable to shop or prepare meals due to illness, injury or disability. Meals are also available for eligible adults with disabilities. Also support disaster registry efforts to…
To provide suppot, education, advocacy and resources to individuals and familys with disabilities
Provide support for parks and recreational services in corvallis, oregon.
FISH of Orchards, Inc. is an emergency food and clothing bank located in east Clark County, WA.
Clay Street Table is operated exclusively for charitable purposes including serving meals and operating food pantries for vulnerable members of the community.
Support and provide news and information to Adults in Custody in Oregon
To provide a balanced diet and food to the needy in Josephine County, Oregon.
Food bank distributing food to individuals in the south lincoln county oregon area.
Provide food to low income families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is With Love Oregon Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harney County Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TSUGA COMMUNITY COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds MARIE MILLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC ↗
- Who funds DAYTIME ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES & RECREATION INC ↗
- Who funds GERMAINES CULINARY INC ↗
- Who funds STONE SOUP PDX ↗
- Who funds MICHELLES LOVE ↗
- Who funds CORVALLIS-BENTON COUNTY COUNCIL OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds POTLUCK IN THE PARK ↗
- Who funds RISING STARS PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WITH LOVE OREGON INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF OREGON CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY BODY ATHLETICS ↗
- Who funds CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER ↗
- Who funds MCK PDX INC ↗
- Who funds Harney County Chamber Of Commerce ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Autzen Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Soar4 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Daytime Enrichment Activities & Recreation Inc — 68% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Stone Soup Pdx — 20% of income from government
- With Love Oregon Inc — 16% of income from government
- Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Soar4 Inc?
Find your warmest path to Soar4 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.