Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.2MArts & Culture$192kCrime & Legal$139kHuman Services$110kFood & Nutrition$51kInternational$25kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMBERLY'S PLACE$12,000
KIDS AT HOPE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
DAPHNE PAOLA NIEVEZ GARCIA - NORTHE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
YUMA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOSTERING HOPE: $1k → 9%SUN STREET CENTERS: $20k → 12%SUN STREET CENTERS: $20k → 12%SUN STREET CENTERS: $20k → 12%ARIZONA'S CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MA
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NM
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 68 repeat orgs$396k to everyone else

68 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
106

Total granted

$2.7M
$360k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+24%

Still filing today

13%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $960k · revenue +19%
  • AP
    Amberlys Place
    9× · 2017–2025 · $139k · revenue +17%
  • SS
    SUN STREET CENTERS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SD
    SEMILLERO DE IDEAS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • HF
    HOPE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • YF
    YRMC FOUNDATION - SCHOOL DRIVE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yuma Children's Academy

The mission of the yca is to create a stable, secure, enriching environment for children and a valuable resource for parents and the community.

Human Services
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Child & Family Services of Yuma Inc

Child & Family Services provides a wide continuum of outpatient services for children and thier families with behavioral/mental health needs, in aspiration of fulfilling the family's individualized goals. Right Turn provides transitional…

Human Services
4
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
5
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
6
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
7
Ymca of Southern Arizona

Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…

Human Services
8
Yuma Multiversity Campus Corporation dba Elevate Southwest

The Organization strives to foster an advanced regional workforce that meets the needs of current and future employers through a regional process of collaboration and partnerships to elevate and advance post-secondary and higher education…

Community Improvement
9
Hospice of Yuma

Hospice care

Human Services
10
Yuma Study Center

Part III, Line 1 - Organizations Mission The mission of the Organization is to provide programs for women and girls that are based on the social teachings of the Catholic Church, that seek to foster an understanding of the important role…

Recreation & Sports
11
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
12
Helping Hands of Yuma

Neighbors helping neighbors maintain independence, dignity, and quality of life

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yuma Community Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Sun Street Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 187 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $600,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONATGEN: $200,000 · OtherTGENGEFFEN THEATER: $150,000 · OtherGEFFEN THEATER+171 more: $834,910 · Other+171 moreUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $960,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation+3 more: $17,250 · EducationAmberlys Place: $138,990 · Crime & LegalSUN STREET CENTERS: $60,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesSEMILLERO DE IDEAS: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionChildrens Museum of Yuma County Inc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureYUMA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,784,910Education$977,250Crime & Legal$138,990Human Services$62,000Food & Nutrition$50,500Arts & Culture$29,500Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $960,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmberlys Place: $138,990 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetSUN STREET CENTERS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChildrens Museum of Yuma County Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetKIDS AT HOPE: $20,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF YUMA COUNTY INC: $12,600 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBallet Yuma: $11,900 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF YUMA: $6,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER PATIENTS ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYUMA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYUMA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL -YUMA ARIZONA: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Amberlys Place ↗
  • Who funds SUN STREET CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds SEMILLERO DE IDEAS ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Museum of Yuma County Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AT HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF YUMA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ballet Yuma ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Smith Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Smith Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 187 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph