Arizona · Nonprofit
KIDS AT HOPE
KIDS AT HOPE (Arizona) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $136,762 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($55,995). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Thunderbirds Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio match
- Executive Council Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio match
- Interest Ministriesshared fundersportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 1% · 2018 1% · 2019 2% · 2020 8% · 2021 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $5k → $5k.
3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of KIDS AT HOPE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
KIDS AT HOPE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
56% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KIDS AT HOPE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 83% · 2021 53% · 2022 97% · 2023 98% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
52% of KIDS AT HOPE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $65k that is directly attributable, 92% of it comes from Arizona funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $72k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Thunderbirds Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio matchAZ · backs 103 organizations that share your funders · funds 301 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Executive Council Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio matchAZ · backs 36 organizations that share your funders · funds 82 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Interest Ministriesshared fundersportfolio matchIL · backs 14 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Valley of the Sun United Wayshared funderslocalportfolio matchAZ · backs 47 organizations that share your funders · funds 211 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Saguaros Childrens Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio matchAZ · backs 26 organizations that share your funders · funds 70 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Fiesta Events Incshared funderslocalportfolio matchAZ · backs 59 organizations that share your funders · funds 159 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Phoenix Suns Charities Incshared funderslocalportfolio matchAZ · backs 62 organizations that share your funders · funds 181 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Otto & Edna Neely Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchAZ · backs 27 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Jw Kieckhefer Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Wilhoit Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Desert Financial Credit Unionshared funderslocalAZ · backs 37 organizations that share your funders · funds 74 organizations near you
- The Board of Visitorsshared funderslocalAZ · backs 29 organizations that share your funders · funds 69 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like KIDS AT HOPE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arizona
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
79% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
81%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Kids at Hope Yuma County Az Chapter · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KIDS AT HOPE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds KIDS AT HOPE?
- KIDS AT HOPE (Arizona) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $136,762 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($55,995). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does KIDS AT HOPE have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $136,762 in grants to KIDS AT HOPE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of KIDS AT HOPE?
- FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $55,995 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like KIDS AT HOPE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2017–2021), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing