· Private foundation
Slayton Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k92 grants · $438k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $642k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $386k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH | $101,600 |
| ROSWELL BAPTIST CHURCH | $86,880 |
| Individual grant recipient | $79,500 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $60,000 |
| WAYNE AVENUE BAPTIST CHURCH | $57,650 |
| HILLCREST BAPTIST CHURCH | $49,600 |
| GRACE BAPTIST TEMPLE | $47,450 |
| CAL FARLEY'S | $35,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $32,950 |
| CASAS POR CRISTO | $32,000 |
| CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE | $31,050 |
| AID FOR WOMEN | $28,500 |
| NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH | $27,600 |
| HARVEST MINISTRIES | $27,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
130 repeat relationships — 110 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL8× · 2017–2024 · $159k · revenue +15%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE8× · 2017–2024 · $126k · revenue +134%
- CPCASAS POR CRISTO8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $137k
- BMBBFI MISSION OFFICEone grant, 2022 · $38k
- FBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…
The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
None
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
To further the name of christ in an international environment by holding church and evangelistic services including house of prayer and training center for equipping people in futhering christianity. the english language is also taught in…
We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International and the most unlike its peers is The Kaylie Brooke Foundation Thompson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds CASAS POR CRISTO ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Community Bible Study ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES INC ↗
- Who funds THE A21 CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds ASSURANCE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds EXODUS CRY INC ↗
- Who funds MALTA FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGE CLEAR ULTRASOUND INC ↗
- Who funds ROSWELL HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation · United Way of Chaves County · The Bolick Foundation · Servant Foundation · Miller Family Foundation · God's Gift · Greater Horizons · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Slayton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Slayton Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Slayton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.