Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Miller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$113kEducation$86kFood & Nutrition$85kReligion$58kAnimals$44kHuman Services$21kPhilanthropy$18kRecreation & Sports$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY KITCHEN$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SE NM$7,500
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN SCHOOL$7,500
CATS$6,000
LIGHTHOUSE ACADEMY$5,000
ROSWELL HIGH SCHOOL SOCCER$5,000
FIRST TEE OF PECOS VALLEY$5,000
SIDNEY GUTIERREZ FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BLANKET VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$1,250
MAY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$1,250
HARVEST MINISTRIES$1,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHAVES COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM INC: $1k → 14%MIDWAY YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CTR: $5k → 20%MIDWAY YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CTR: $3k → 20%MIDWAY YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CTR: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$513k · 22 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$513k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+51%

Still filing today

36%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +46%
  • HM
    HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +15%
  • TF
    THE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SG
    SIDNEY GUITIERREZ MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • RF
    REINS FOR LIFE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • MY
    MIDWAY YOUTH & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roswell Refuge for Battered Adults

To provide a safe haven for victims of domestic violence in chaves county new mexico. the refuge provides resources for life skills and other services.

2
Roswell Chamber of Commerce

To promote economic development, business retention, and roswell as a place to retire and live.

3
Ross County Humane Society Inc

The society runs an animal shelter that offers pet adoption, veterinary services, burials, etc.

Animals
4
Justice Access Support and Solutions for Health

Casa de salud provides health care services to low-income, indigent and underserved populations in new mexico. primary care, counseling, acupuncture, massage, reiki, addictions treatment, syringe exchange, medical debt management, case…

Health
5
Roswell W F L Inc

The purpose of the organization is to build and strengthen healthy family relationships and individual life-skills through best practice programs that produce positive behaviors while respecting the dignity of those we serve in chaves…

Human Services
6
Northwest New Mexico Seniors Inc

Senior citizens meals and activities services.

Human Services
7
Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission

We provide a faith-based recovery program for men, women, and children who need help overcoming life's challenges.

Housing & Shelter
8
Gus Winter Roswell Rotary Foundation Inc

Provide support to the needy of roswell and chaves county for food, clothing, medical and basic needs.

9
Rio Rancho Chamber of Commerce

A regional Chamber committed to improving the quality of community life driven by business leadership mentorship advocacy and prosperity.

10
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
11
Meals on Wheels New Mexico

Delivering healthy meals and friendship neighbor to neighbor. The Organization cooks, prepares, and delivers meals to hungry people across New Mexico and provides contact with these people to ensure that their dietary health and other…

Food & Nutrition
12
Rebound New Mexico

Rebound New Mexico RNM works to empower and uplift communities through focused engagement and improvement initiatives. We strive to ensure that every New Mexican feels valued and encouraged to lead with compassion and innovation. Together…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lighthouse Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $95,390 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATS — $43,000 · OtherCATSIndividual grant recipient — $29,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS — $26,250 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSSIDNEY GUITIERREZ MIDDLE SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherSIDNEY GUITIERREZ MIDDLE SCHOOLBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SE NM — $17,500 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $15,000 · OtherSIDNEY GUTIERREZ FOUNDATION — $12,500 · Other+27 more — $107,502 · Other+27 moreCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $85,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY KITCHE…HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL — $58,333 · ReligionHARVEST MIN…THE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC — $31,450 · Youth DevelopmentLIGHTHOUSE ACADEMY INC — $22,500 · EducationASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHAVES COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementMIDWAY YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$366,542Food & Nutrition$85,000Religion$58,333Youth Development$31,450Education$22,500Community Improvement$20,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $85,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL — $58,333 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC — $31,450 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE ACADEMY INC — $22,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHAVES COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMIDWAY YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $9,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetREINS FOR LIFE INC — $6,480 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetROSWELL HOMELESS COALITION INC — $5,600 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROSWELL HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRoswell Symphony Orchestra Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROSWELL MUSEUM & ART CENTER FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHAVES COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MIDWAY YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds REINS FOR LIFE INC
  • Who funds ROSWELL HOMELESS COALITION INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CHAVES COUNTY
  • Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF NEW MEXICO
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM
  • Who funds ROSWELL HUMANE SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Toles Family FoundationNM17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Toles Family Foundation · The Armstrong-Clark Foundation · Paul McCutchen Foundation · Rolla R Hinkle III Foundation · J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation · United Way of Chaves County · Slayton Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Miller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Miller Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Miller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph