Skip to content

· Private foundation

Skyros Benevolent Society

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$34kReligion$22kArts & Culture$7kHealth$5kEducation$5kEnvironment$4kHousing & Shelter$4kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
3
States reached
$416k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church$1,450
Penelope House$1,300
Cathedral of the Immaculate Con$700
Individual grant recipient$650
Catholic Charities$600
Mobile Museum of Art$600
Mulherin Home$550
Little Sister of the Poor$500
St Jude Childrens Hospital$500
United Cerebal Palsy$400
Dauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation$370
Waterfront Rescue Mission$350
Samaritans Purse$300
Ronald McDonald House$300
History Museum of Mobile$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%MULHERIN CUSTODIAL HOME: $1k → 19%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%The Mulherin Custodial Home: $600 → 19%The Mulherin Custodial Home: $600 → 19%The Mulherin Custodial Home: $300 → 19%NEST: $100 → 19%PENELOPE HOUSE: $2k → 19%Penelope House: $2k → 19%Penelope House: $2k → 19%Penelope House: $1k → 19%Our Sisters closet: $250 → 19%Our Sisters Closet: $235 → 19%Our Sisters closet: $205 → 19%THE 74 CLUB: $100 → 19%OUR SISTERS CLOSET: $299 → 19%OUR SISTERS CLOSET: $100 → 19%Our Sisters Closet: $100 → 19%Our Sisters Closet: $100 → 19%Our Sisters Closet: $100 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 54 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
39

Total granted

$83k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-28%

Still filing today

37%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PENELOPE HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +26%
  • MC
    Mulherin Custodial Home Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +20%
  • OS
    Our Sisters Closet Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • AG
    ANNUNCIATION GREEK CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • UM
    USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUE
    one grant, 2017 · $900
  • FH
    Fisher House of Southern LA
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Mobile Inc

The Organization was formed to build, own and operate a Ronald McDonald House in Mobile, Alabama. The facility provides overnight lodging for children and their parents who travel long distances to Mobile area hospitals for various…

Human Services
2
The Junior League of Mobile Al Inc

Organization of women committed to promoting volunteerism, developing the potential of women, and improving communities through the effective action and leadership of trained volunteers.

Community Improvement
3
Mothers Milk Bank of Alabama

Oversee and facilitate the collection, pasteurization, and distribution of human milk. Provide training and education for healthcare providers and community members about the health importance of human milk for neonates and infants.

Human Services
4
Mobile County Pals

Provide services and support to prevent cruelty and provide shelter to animals

Animals
5
Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc

The Center operates in Southwest Alabama providing counseling and guidance to individuals, families, and groups experiencing problems related to stress, family discord, parenting, phobias, aging, rape, and financial difficulties.

Human Services
6
Mobile Arts Council Inc

Mobile Arts Councils mission is to enrich the quality of life in the Mobile area through increasing accessibility to the arts and promoting a vibrant cultural community.

Arts & Culture
7
Rebuilding Together of South Al

Repairing homes, revitalizing communities and rebuilding lives.

Housing & Shelter
8
Mobile United Inc

To present a forum for business and citizens where an exchange of ideas can occur that will make Mobile a better place to live, work and do business.

Community Improvement
9
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
10
Maritime & Seafood Industry Museum

To preserve and interpret the maritime history and heritage of biloxi and the mississippi gulf coast.

Arts & Culture
11
Dauphin Restoration Society Inc

Restore & maintain historic building(s) in mobile alabama.

Arts & Culture
12
Friends of Municipal Park

Fomp's primary purpose is to revitalize and rebuild the municipal park so that the youth of mobile can have a safe place to play sports.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Society for Prevention of Cr; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church: $9,990 · OtherAnnunciation Greek Orthodox ChurchAnnuciation Greek Orthodox Church: $5,500 · OtherAnnuciation Greek Orthodox ChurchCathedral of the Immaculate Con: $2,700 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $2,550 · OtherST ATHANASIOS GREEK CHURCH: $2,380 · Other+72 more: $40,813 · Other+72 morePENELOPE HOUSE INC: $15,300 · Human ServicesPENELOPE HOUSE INCMulherin Custodial Home Inc: $2,700 · Human ServicesMulherin Custodial Home …Our Sisters Closet Inc: $1,389 · Human ServicesOur Sisters Closet Inc+3 more: $400 · Human ServicesDauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation Inc: $1,690 · EnvironmentALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentMobile Baykeeper Inc: $550 · EnvironmentLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED: $900 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $800 · HealthHome of Grace For Women Inc: $450 · HealthCaringBridge: $100 · HealthMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $950 · Arts & CultureUSS ALABAMA BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION: $600 · Arts & CultureHistoric Mobile Preservation Society Inc: $270 · Arts & CultureMobile Symphony Inc: $250 · Arts & CultureMcKemie Place Inc: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterFeeding the Gulf Coast: $900 · Food & Nutrition
Other$63,933Human Services$19,789Environment$3,240Health$2,250Arts & Culture$2,070Housing & Shelter$1,000Food & Nutrition$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $15,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMulherin Custodial Home Inc: $2,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation Inc: $1,690 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOur Sisters Closet Inc: $1,389 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMcKemie Place Inc: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSS ALABAMA BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION: $600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOBILE ANIMAL SHELTER: $600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMobile Baykeeper Inc: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHome of Grace For Women Inc: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANSOM MINISTRIES INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $330 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Mobile Preservation Society Inc: $270 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN MOBILE ALLIANCE INC: $115 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEST CORPORATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 74 CLUB: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCaringBridge: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mulherin Custodial Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Our Sisters Closet Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds McKemie Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds USS ALABAMA BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOBILE ANIMAL SHELTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL30.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc · Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · Mapp Family Foundation · Dog Hill Foundation · Ws Foundation Inc Blacksher White-Spunner

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skyros Benevolent Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skyros Benevolent Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Skyros Benevolent Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph