· Private foundation
Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of NAN H ALTMAYER CHARITABLE TRUST REGIONS BANK TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $417k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DONORS CHOOSEORG | $108,811 |
| ANERA | $25,000 |
| UNRWA | $25,000 |
| DIVING WITH A PURPOSE | $24,400 |
| UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| PENELOPE HOUSE | $20,000 |
| AUBURN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF FORESTRY WILDLIFE AND ENVIRONMENT | $20,000 |
| THE CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUCATION | $20,000 |
| PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPLIN'S FIRST RESPONDER'S FUND | $20,000 |
| DWELL MOBILE | $20,000 |
| MOBILE OPERA | $18,000 |
| NATIONAL DOMESTIC WORKER ALLIANCE | $15,000 |
| O'NEILL THEATER | $15,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE (MUSIC DEPARTMENT) | $15,000 |
| SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE (GENERAL FUND) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DDONORSCHOOSEORG8× · 2018–2025 · $544k · revenue +1%
AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID8× · 2018–2025 · $154k · revenue +153%- PHPENELOPE HOUSE INC8× · 2018–2025 · $121k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- URUN RELIEF & WORKS AGENCYone grant, 2022 · $35k
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +19%
- U(UNRWA (UN RELIEF & WORKS AGENCY)one grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
Community and economic development
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
America's watershed initiative serves as a trusted voice that brings partners together and champions sound science to secure a future in which the rivers and people of the mississippi river watershed thrive.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Equality florida institute is the educational arm of the largest civil rights organization in florida dedicated to ending discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Space Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Diving With a Purpose and Development Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds Ozanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
- Who funds EUGENE O'NEILL MEMORIAL THEATER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SPRING HILL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DWELL MOBILE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds MOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds BARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · The Moses Foundation · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Rjjb Family Foundation · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · Dog Hill Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Riverfront Childrens Center Inc — 21% of income from government
- Hartford Stage Company Inc — 3% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee?
Find your warmest path to Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.