· Private foundation
Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of CRAMPTON TRUST #1255000731 REGIONS BANK TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $417k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM OF THE GULF OF MEXICO | $100,000 |
| EXPLORE CENTER INC | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $100,000 |
| BAYSHORE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCASY CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| WILMER HALL CHILDRENS HOME | $50,000 |
| MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART | $35,000 |
| SPRING HILL COLLEGE | $32,947 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF COASTAL ALABAMA | $25,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF CENTRAL GULF COAST | $25,000 |
| SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES BCA VIA HEALTH FITNESS AND ENRICHMENT CTR | $25,000 |
| ST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| DAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
76 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC6× · 2017–2025 · $420k · revenue +72%
- UCUMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION5× · 2020–2025 · $400k · revenue +28%
- VHVictory Health Partners Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $300k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- BABARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $125k · revenue -82%
- COCHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $50k
- SIST IGNATIUS CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operation of a public charter school in Mobile Alabama.
Provide citizens a means to protect the beauty, health and heritage of the Mobile Bay Watershed, Alabamas waterways and coastal communities.
To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers
Oversee and facilitate the collection, pasteurization, and distribution of human milk. Provide training and education for healthcare providers and community members about the health importance of human milk for neonates and infants.
The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.
The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…
Repairing homes, revitalizing communities and rebuilding lives.
The Center operates in Southwest Alabama providing counseling and guidance to individuals, families, and groups experiencing problems related to stress, family discord, parenting, phobias, aging, rape, and financial difficulties.
To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects
Encourage and enhance advocacy and family support services on behalf of individuals suffering from mental illness.
Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center, Inc. is a non-profit organization that is dedicated to ending child abuse through education, advocacy, counseling, family support, and the pursuit of justice.
To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Southwest Alabama Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE EXPLORE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Victory Health Partners Inc ↗
- Who funds BAYSHORE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ALABAMA PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds SPRING HILL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM OF THE GULF OF MEXICO ↗
- Who funds INFIRMARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST LIGHT COMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC ↗
- Who funds FUSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE CENTRAL GULF COAST INC ↗
- Who funds DUMAS WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Dauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Mulherin Custodial Home Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds BELLINGRATH GARDENS AND HOME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ozanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
- Who funds RANSOM MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE INFIRMARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN DIABETES EDUCATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Mobile Symphony Inc ↗
- Who funds McKemie Place Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · Mapp Family Foundation · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Rjjb Family Foundation · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Southwest Alabama Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee?
Find your warmest path to Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.