Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sky View Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$6.8MPhilanthropy$313kHousing & Shelter$101kEducation$100kRecreation & Sports$72kCommunity Improvement$2kAnimals$526Youth Development$526Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $382k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$160,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST VIA FIDELITY CHARITABLE$900,000
PLACER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE$160,000
NORTHERN SIERRA PARTNERSHIPCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES$150,000
Individual grant recipient$72,363
FIDELITY GIFT TRUST$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PLACER NATURE CENTER: $500 → 6%NORTHERN SIERRA PARTNERSHIPCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $150k → 10%EARTHJUSTICE: $25k → 10%MOUNTAIN AREA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $250k → 11%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $160k → 16%HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $250k → 9%THE MARGUERITE FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 9%SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $50k → 10%EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST: $1.2M → 11%PLACER LAND TRUST: $872k → 6%NORTHERN SIERRA PARTNERSHIP: $100k → 10%GRANITE CHIEF WILDERNESS PROTECTION LEAGUE: $5k → 11%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $30k → 16%SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $39k → 10%EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST VIA FIDELITY CHARITABLE: $900k → 11%PLACER LAND TRUST: $335k → 6%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $20k → 16%EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST: $625k → 11%PLACER LAND TRUST: $318k → 6%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $10k → 16%EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST: $350k → 11%PLACER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250k → 6%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $5k → 16%EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST: $300k → 11%PLACER LAND TRUST: $153k → 6%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $5k → 16%PLACER LAND TRUST: $100k → 6%CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $5k → 16%COUNTY OF PLACER: $100k → 6%AUBURN RECREATION DISTRICT: $72k → 6%PLACER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37k → 6%PLACER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLACER COUNTY: $526 → 6%SAVE AUBURN RAVINE SALMON: $526 → 6%PROJECT AMERICAN RIVER CANYONS: $526 → 6%PLACER NATURE CENTER: $526 → 6%AUBURN PLACER PERFORMING ARTS: $500 → 6%PLACERARTS: $500 → 6%PLACER LAND TRUST: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Sky View Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Sky View Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 6 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$5.1M
$835k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+66%

Still filing today

83%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PLACER LAND TRUST
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.8M · revenue ×17
  • TD
    TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST
    2× · 2018–2019 · $500k · revenue +6%
  • PN
    PLACER NATURE CENTER
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • MA
    Mountain Area Preservation Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -30% · 30% of their budget
  • HI
    HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • CO
    COUNTY OF PLACER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
2
Palouse Land Trust Inc

Our mission is to work with landowners and communities to conserve the lands we love, now and forever, and to enrich connections to the natural world.

Environment
3
Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance

At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.

—
4
Santa Clara River Conservancy

The Santa Clara River Conservancy represents the diverse interests of the Santa Clara River, from the flood plain to the highest tributaries, and seeks to secure, sustain, and manage significant lands and waters that provide habitat for…

Environment
5
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
6
Sierra Foothill Conservancy

Protect, manage and preserve lands and wildlife having unique natural resources and cultural qualities within and near the foothills of the sierra nevada range.

Environment
7
Planning & Conservation League

The Planning and Conservaton League is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization that serves as the lobbying arm of environmental community -- passing, enforcing, and protecting laws and initiatives that safeguard our environment and communities.

—
8
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
9
Siskiyou Land Conservancy

The Siskiyou Land Conservancy is a state and federally approved non-profit organization that assists landowners who want to protect the natural values of their land, either through purchase or establishment of conservation easements.

Environment
10
Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc

CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.

Unclassified
11
League to Save Lake Tahoe

Mission statement: the league to save lake tahoe protects and restores the environmental health, sustainability, and scenic beauty of the lake tahoe basin. we focus on water quality and its clarity for the preservation of a pristine lake…

Religion
12
Bamberger Ranch Preserve
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Placer Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is The Marguerite Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST: $2,505,000 · OtherEMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUSTEMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST VIA FIDELITY CHARITABLE: $900,000 · OtherEMIGRANT TRAILS GREENWAY TRUST VIA FIDELITY CHARITABLEMountain Area Preservation Foundation: $250,000 · OtherMountain Area Preservation FoundationNORTHERN SIERRA PARTNERSHIPCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $150,000 · Other+11 more: $314,941 · Other+11 morePLACER LAND TRUST: $1,777,851 · EnvironmentPLACER LAND TRUSTTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $500,000 · EnvironmentTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUSTHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $250,000 · EnvironmentHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUSTCalifornia Sportfishing Protection Allia: $235,000 · EnvironmentCalifornia Sportfishing Protection Allia+3 more: $115,299 · EnvironmentPlacer Community Foundation: $288,030 · PhilanthropyTHE MARGUERITE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $2,104 · Education
Other$4,119,941Environment$2,878,150Philanthropy$288,030Education$102,104

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLACER LAND TRUST: $1,777,851 over 6y, 16% of budgetPlacer Community Foundation: $288,030 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetMountain Area Preservation Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $250,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCalifornia Sportfishing Protection Allia: $235,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetTHE MARGUERITE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $89,273 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Business Council: $2,104 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $526 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLACER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Placer Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Area Preservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds California Sportfishing Protection Allia ↗
  • Who funds THE MARGUERITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Sierra Business Council ↗
  • Who funds PLACER NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Placer County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sky View Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sky View Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sky View Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sky View Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sky View’s filings →

    More from the funding graph