Skip to content
Skoll Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Skoll Fund

The SKOLL FUND is a supporting organization associated with silicon valley community foundation.

$56M
Granted FY2024still arriving
147
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$4.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$54MPhilanthropy$41MHealth$38MEnvironment$34MPublic Benefit$24MEducation$16MCommunity Improvement$11MArts & Culture$10MOther$0
02FY2024 · 147 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 147 grants below total $51,737,468, the rows itemized in this filing. The $56,133,469 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,396,001 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k62 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $4.1M
  • $250k+46 grants · $46M
$75,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$946M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$4,500,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$3,177,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION$3,000,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$2,240,000
HEALTHY KIDS BRIGHTER FUTURE INCORPORATED$2,015,000
MUSO INC$2,015,000
EARTHENABLE INC$2,015,000
FINANCING ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH$2,000,000
RIGHTS AND RESOURCES INSTITUTE INC$2,000,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$1,500,000
INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR VALUING IMPACTS INC$1,500,000
CONTINA IMPACT$1,050,000
VOTERUNLEAD$1,000,000
AVINA AMERICAS INC$1,000,000
EQUIS INSTITUTE$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $10.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $500k → 9%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $300k → 15%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $75k → 15%SISTER SONG INC: $50k → 13%Realize Impact: $1.0M → 10%Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc: $640k → 9%FRIENDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $75k → 9%REALIZE IMPACT: $10k → 10%INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS INC: $15k → 9%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $10k → 8%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT INC: $8k → 10%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $200k → 14%Heart Women & Girls Project: $100k → 14%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $10k → 16%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FORPROFIT CORPORATION: $8k → 12%GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $500k → 8%BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $225k → 8%BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $75k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $500k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $15k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION: $500k → 17%THE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THORN: $1.5M → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%Girls Who Code Inc: $100k → 17%THORN: $15k → 17%Savelife Foundation USA: $2.0M → 17%HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH INC: $500k → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $1.5M → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $75k → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $15k → 17%APOPO US INC: $165k → 14%APOPO US INC: $75k → 14%Jordan River Foundation: $10k → 14%APOPO US INC: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Skoll Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Skoll Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148M · 147 repeat orgs$54M to everyone else

147 repeat relationships: 78 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

147
171

Total granted

$148M
$37M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+12%

Still filing today

99%
97%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
InternationalEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PANORAMA GLOBAL
    3× · 2021–2024 · $7.6M · revenue +47%
  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +32% · 62% of their budget
  • MM
    MEDIC MOBILE INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $5.6M · revenue +90% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • MI
    Meedan Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M · revenue -13% · 33% of their budget
  • SF
    SAVELIFE FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2023 · $2.0M · revenue -14%
  • II
    ID INSIGHT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
8
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink; the most unlike its peers is Build Health International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

394 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 394 of the 401 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

39
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
392/394
Grantees still filing
210/394
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW VENTURE FUND: $18,025,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $13,000,000 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIM…HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM: $4,655,000 · EnvironmentHEALTH CARE WITHOUT H…CERES INC: $2,752,500 · EnvironmentCERES INCFOREST TRENDS ASSOCIATION: $2,650,000 · EnvironmentFOREST TRENDS ASSOCIA…RIGHTS AND RESOURCES INSTITUTE INC: $2,030,000 · Environment+8 more: $5,940,000 · Environment+8 morePANORAMA GLOBAL: $7,577,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBALSEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND: $3,590,000 · InternationalSEARCH FOR COMMON GRO…EARTHENABLE INC: $2,915,000 · InternationalEARTHENABLE INCEDUCATE GIRLS: $2,670,000 · InternationalEDUCATE GIRLSWITNESS INC: $2,475,000 · InternationalPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $2,165,000 · InternationalFINANCING ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH: $2,015,000 · InternationalMUSO INC: $2,015,000 · InternationalID INSIGHT INC: $2,000,000 · InternationalARMMAN-USA: $1,725,000 · International+36 more: $19,728,960 · International+36 moreTIDES FOUNDATION: $13,000,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDAT…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $6,225,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER P…Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $2,380,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valle…BUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyBUILD HEALTH …RISE EDUCATION FUND: $1,510,000 · Philanthropy+11 more: $4,675,000 · Philanthropy+11 moreMAYO CLINIC: $7,750,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICMEDIC MOBILE INC: $5,600,000 · HealthMEDIC MOBILE…HEALTH LEADS INC: $4,500,000 · HealthHEALTH LEADS…THE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $2,950,000 · HealthTHE HEALTH I…GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC: $1,600,000 · HealthGLOBAL HEALT…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,525,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN …CRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $1,515,000 · HealthCRISIS TEXT …+4 more: $1,865,000 · Health+4 moreECHOING GREEN INC: $6,220,000 · EducationECHOING GR…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,500,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTE…VILLAGEREACH: $2,450,000 · EducationVILLAGEREA…JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC: $1,615,000 · EducationJOURNALISM…Civic Nation: $1,250,000 · EducationCONTINA IMPACT: $1,050,000 · EducationDEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE: $1,000,000 · Education+20 more: $6,153,085 · Education+20 moreB LAB COMPANY: $3,460,000 · Public BenefitHEALTHY LEARNERS INC: $2,015,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY AND CIVIC LIFE: $1,515,000 · Public BenefitISSUE ONE: $1,350,000 · Public BenefitCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC: $1,270,000 · Public BenefitWOMEN IN GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $1,000,000 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $710,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE FOR FREEDOMS INC: $510,000 · Public BenefitRESET TECH: $500,000 · Public BenefitFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $475,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $740,000 · Public BenefitSAVELIFE FOUNDATION USA: $2,015,000 · Human ServicesGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $1,590,000 · Human ServicesTHORN: $1,515,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $1,327,500 · Human ServicesRealize Impact: $1,010,000 · Human ServicesINDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS INC: $655,000 · Human ServicesFriends International Inc: $575,000 · Human ServicesCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION: $500,000 · Human ServicesHIP HOP Public Health Inc: $500,000 · Human ServicesGIVE FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · Human Services+4 more: $1,135,000 · Human ServicesILLUMINATIVE INC: $2,200,000 · OtherThe ONE Campaign: $1,700,000 · OtherFAIR COUNT INC: $2,250,000 · OtherCOMMON FUTURE: $2,015,000 · OtherGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,700,000 · OtherMeedan Inc: $2,515,000 · OtherAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $2,425,000 · OtherFOOD FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,030,000 · Other+51 more: $32,148,000 · Other+51 more
Environment$49,052,500International$48,875,960Philanthropy$29,790,000Health$27,305,000Education$24,238,085Public Benefit$13,545,000Human Services$11,322,500Other$48,983,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $18,025,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $13,000,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $13,000,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $7,750,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $7,577,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $6,225,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $6,220,000 over 3y, 62% of budgetMEDIC MOBILE INC: $5,600,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetHEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM: $4,655,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetHEALTH LEADS INC: $4,500,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND: $3,590,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetB LAB COMPANY: $3,460,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $2,950,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetEARTHENABLE INC: $2,915,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetCERES INC: $2,752,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetEDUCATE GIRLS: $2,670,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFOREST TRENDS ASSOCIATION: $2,650,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetMeedan Inc: $2,515,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetWITNESS INC: $2,475,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $2,450,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $2,425,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $2,380,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR COUNT INC: $2,250,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetILLUMINATIVE INC: $2,200,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $2,165,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetRIGHTS AND RESOURCES INSTITUTE INC: $2,030,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetFOOD FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,030,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetFINANCING ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH: $2,015,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNERS INC: $2,015,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCOMMON FUTURE: $2,015,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetMUSO INC: $2,015,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetID INSIGHT INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetARMMAN-USA: $1,725,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetThe ONE Campaign: $1,700,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,700,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC: $1,615,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC: $1,600,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $1,590,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetSundance Institute: $1,535,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,525,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHORN: $1,515,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $1,515,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetRISE EDUCATION FUND: $1,510,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR VALUING IMPACTS INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetASHOKA: $1,450,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Skoll FoundationThe David and Lucile …The William & Flora H…Gates FoundationWellspring Philanthro…Foundation to Promote…The Rockefeller Found…Silicon Valley Commun…Conrad N Hilton Found…The Ford FoundationJewish Community Fede…Mulago Foundation
The Skoll FoundationCA228.1× affinity124 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Skoll Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Gates Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · The Rockefeller Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Mulago Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skoll Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skoll Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Walden Woods Project: 6% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 401 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Skoll’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home