Skip to content

· Private foundation

Skip & Meg Herman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$201kFood & Nutrition$180kHealth$123kPhilanthropy$103kEducation$85kCrime & Legal$55kArts & Culture$29kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$862k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOODMAN THEATRE$10,000
NOURISHING HOPE$10,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$10,000
AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION$10,000
MONTANA LAND RELIANCE$10,000
THE SHANE CENTER$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER RESEARCH ALLIANCE$2,500
BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION$2,500
THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - INNOVATION 80$2,500
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,500
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
AMERICAN RIVERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $1k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%LET IT BE US: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$691k · 29 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
25

Total granted

$691k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+15%

Still filing today

69%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +167%
  • NH
    NOURISHING HOPE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +210%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • NP
    NW PRITZKR SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +44%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
3
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
4
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
11
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is United in Light Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOURISHING HOPE: $110,000 · OtherNOURISHING HOPEJUF: $50,500 · OtherJUFNW PRITZKR SCHOOL OF LAW: $50,000 · OtherNW PRITZKR SCHOOL OF LAWMASSENA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FND: $40,000 · OtherMASSENA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FNDILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $18,250 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $13,500 · Other+36 more: $119,650 · Other+36 moreAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $110,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDAT…THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $75,000 · EnvironmentTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANC…AMERICAN RIVERS INC: $12,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INCJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $90,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED F…AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $33,000 · PhilanthropyAMY KROUSE ROSE…+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $70,000 · EducationCORPORATIO…THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVER…MALOTO INC: $3,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $70,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $25,000 · Civil RightsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $4,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsRed Door Animal Shelter: $1,750 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $500 · AnimalsUNITED IN LIGHT INC: $500 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $500 · Animals
Other$401,900Environment$197,000Philanthropy$125,500Education$84,500Food & Nutrition$70,000Civil Rights$25,000Animals$11,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $110,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWEET GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMALOTO INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRed Door Animal Shelter: $1,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetErikson Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontana Jewish Project: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAIMEN FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLET IT BE US: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED IN LIGHT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SWEET GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MALOTO INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds ABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Red Door Animal Shelter ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skip & Meg Herman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skip & Meg Herman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Skip & Meg Herman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Skip & Meg Herman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skip & Meg Herman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph