Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Single Stop USA Inc

(see schedule o)

$395k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$5.8MCrime & Legal$5.1MEducation$4.0MHousing & Shelter$3.4MFood & Nutrition$2.4MCommunity Improvement$2.3MHealth$2.1MCivil Rights$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $242,602 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $395,485 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $152,883 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$85,743
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HOSPITALITY$86,689
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$85,743
CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$70,170
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BRONX WORKS: $270k → 28%FULFILL: $18k → 6%GROW BROOKLYN: $50k → 20%ARIVA INC: $178k → 28%THE RIVER FUND: $115k → 13%ARIVA INC: $114k → 28%THE RIVER FUND: $100k → 13%GROW BROOKLYN: $15k → 20%BROOKLYN CHINESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $38k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $696k → 17%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $413k → 13%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $500k → 17%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $88k → 13%THE FINANCIAL CLINIC: $90k → 20%COUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 20%COUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 20%John Jay Research Foundation: $65k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $149k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $75k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $42k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $342k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $260k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $182k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $140k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $86k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $76k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $72k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $59k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $35k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $330k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $165k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $75k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $56k → 17%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $225k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $21k → 17%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $220k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $17k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $215k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $46k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 49 repeat orgs$917k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

49 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
16

Total granted

$25M
$917k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+38%

Still filing today

94%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +65%
  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.7M · revenue +52%
  • GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.2M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BRONXWORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $270k · revenue +80%
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS AT NYU LANGONE
    one grant, 2019 · $170k
  • CM
    Change Machinegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $90k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of New York City

Uwnyc works with a coalition of trusted partners to unite community power with citywide possibility. together, we meet today's most urgent needs while building transformative solutions for tomorrow - striving for health, opportunity, and…

Philanthropy
2
Manhattan Legal Services

Manhattan legal services is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
3
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
4
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
5
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
6
Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council On Jewish Poverty

Metropolitan ny coordinating council is a not-for-profit organization which serves as a primary advocate for the social welfare needs of the poor, near-poor and elderly in the metro ny area. the entity is dedicated to the alleviation of…

Human Services
7
Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York Inc

To provide social service programs for families and individuals enabling people of all ages to reach their full potential.

—
8
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
9
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
10
Lsny-Bronx Corporation

Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Education
11
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
12
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Met Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Housing & Support Se…Performing Arts VenuesJewish Religious EducationPrivate Grantmaking Foundat…Youth Development and Econo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr22%31%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr9%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%7%10–20yr22%38%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr9%30%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/64
the rest of the field
12%
5,650/48,630

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/61
Grantees still filing
55/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $1,196,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICESHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $929,716 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENTMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMU…HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $495,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE I…SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES — $445,000 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF SERVICESGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC — $322,000 · Human ServicesGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT …ARIVA INC — $291,500 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INC — $270,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC — $266,694 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INC — $260,000 · Human ServicesTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC — $215,000 · Human Services+7 more — $493,523 · Human Services+7 morePROJECT HOSPITALITY INC — $928,956 · OtherPROJECT HOSPITALITY INCNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC — $694,000 · OtherNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTAN…THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC — $637,981 · OtherTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY …GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER — $481,750 · OtherGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMU…URBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $352,500 · OtherURBAN JUSTICE CENTERNewYork-PresbyterianLawrence Hospital — $325,000 · OtherNewYork-PresbyterianLaw…FIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC — $290,000 · OtherFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE …Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation — $221,250 · OtherWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $285,000 · Other+16 more — $1,180,568 · Other+16 moreTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY — $1,715,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCI…Make the Road New York — $899,174 · Crime & LegalMake the Road New …LEGAL SERVICES NYC — $850,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES NYCTHE BRONX DEFENDERS — $660,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BRONX DEFENDER…+1 more — $60,000 · Crime & LegalBENEFITS DATA TRUST — $3,727,499 · EducationBENEFITS DATA TRU…The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $225,000 · EducationThe New York Publ…+1 more — $14,183 · EducationCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $2,578,182 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR URBA…NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION — $681,325 · Community ImprovementNORTHERN MANHAT…FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $297,500 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK FOR N…PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $864,983 · HealthPUBLIC HE…THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC — $572,250 · HealthTHE FORTU…THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH — $300,000 · HealthTHE INSTI…HEALTH LEADS INC — $250,000 · HealthHEALTH LE…MEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC — $81,000 · Health+2 more — $96,091 · HealthPART OF THE SOLUTION — $426,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $425,000 · Food & NutritionSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc — $200,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $60,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$5,684,433Other$5,397,005Crime & Legal$4,184,174Education$3,966,682Community Improvement$3,557,007Health$2,164,324Food & Nutrition$1,111,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBENEFITS DATA TRUST — $3,727,499 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $2,578,182 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY — $1,715,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $1,196,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $929,716 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC — $928,956 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMake the Road New York — $899,174 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $864,983 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES NYC — $850,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC — $694,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION — $681,325 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE BRONX DEFENDERS — $660,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC — $637,981 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC — $572,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $500,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $495,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER — $481,750 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES — $445,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION — $426,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $425,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $352,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNewYork-PresbyterianLawrence Hospital — $325,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC — $322,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH — $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $297,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARIVA INC — $291,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC — $290,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $285,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC — $270,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC — $266,694 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $260,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH LEADS INC — $250,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation — $221,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC — $215,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE — $168,523 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMet Council Inc — $157,279 over 3y, 56% of budgetHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC — $141,881 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetRESERVE ELDER SERVICE INC — $137,490 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $120,742 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChange Machine — $90,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC — $81,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROW BROOKLYN INC — $65,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetJOHN JAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $60,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationMother Cabrini Health…The Hyde and Watson F…United Way of New Yor…The New York Communit…Research Foundation o…Altman FoundationThe Fan Fox and Lesli…Food Bank for New Yor…Booth Ferris Foundati…Brooklyn Community Fo…New York Immigration …
Robin Hood FoundationNY56.8× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · United Way of New York City · The New York Community Trust · Research Foundation of the City University of New York · Altman Foundation · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Food Bank for New York City · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Brooklyn Community Foundation · New York Immigration Coalition Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Single Stop USA Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Hopes Community Action Partnership — 47% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Morris County Inc — 17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home