Skip to content
Single Stop USA Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Single Stop USA Inc

(see schedule o)

$203k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$5.8MCrime & Legal$5.1MEducation$4.0MHousing & Shelter$3.4MFood & Nutrition$2.4MCommunity Improvement$2.3MHealth$2.1MCivil Rights$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $158,432, the rows itemized in this filing. The $203,016 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,584 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$46,242
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HOSPITALITY$67,833
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$46,242
CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$44,357
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BRONX WORKS: $270k → 28%FULFILL: $18k → 6%GROW BROOKLYN: $50k → 20%ARIVA INC: $178k → 28%THE RIVER FUND: $115k → 13%ARIVA INC: $114k → 28%THE RIVER FUND: $100k → 13%GROW BROOKLYN: $15k → 20%BROOKLYN CHINESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $38k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $696k → 17%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $413k → 13%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $500k → 17%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $88k → 13%THE FINANCIAL CLINIC: $90k → 20%COUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 20%COUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 20%John Jay Research Foundation: $65k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $149k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $75k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $42k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $342k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $260k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $182k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $140k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $86k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $76k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $72k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $59k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $46k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $35k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $330k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $165k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $75k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $56k → 17%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $225k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $21k → 17%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $220k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $17k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $215k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $46k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 49 repeat orgs$917k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
16

Total granted

$25M
$917k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+38%

Still filing today

94%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +65%
  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.7M · revenue +52%
  • GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.2M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BRONXWORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $270k · revenue +80%
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS AT NYU LANGONE
    one grant, 2019 · $170k
  • CM
    Change Machine
    one grant, 2018 · $90k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattan Legal Services

Manhattan legal services is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
2
United Way of New York City

Uwnyc works with a coalition of trusted partners to unite community power with citywide possibility. together, we meet today's most urgent needs while building transformative solutions for tomorrow - striving for health, opportunity, and…

Philanthropy
3
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
4
Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council On Jewish Poverty

Metropolitan ny coordinating council is a not-for-profit organization which serves as a primary advocate for the social welfare needs of the poor, near-poor and elderly in the metro ny area. the entity is dedicated to the alleviation of…

Human Services
5
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
6
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
7
Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York Inc

To provide social service programs for families and individuals enabling people of all ages to reach their full potential.

—
8
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
9
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
10
Lsny-Bronx Corporation

Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Education
11
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
12
New York Apartment Association Inc

Nyaa provides services to landlords including computerized rent registration of rent stabilized apartments with the new york state division of housing and community renewal in compliance with nys & nyc laws & regulations.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Met Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/61
Grantees still filing
54/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $1,196,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICESHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $975,958 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENTMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMU…HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $495,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE I…SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $445,000 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF SERVICESGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC: $322,000 · Human ServicesGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT …ARIVA INC: $291,500 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $266,694 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INC: $260,000 · Human ServicesTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $215,000 · Human Services+7 more: $493,523 · Human Services+7 morePROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $996,789 · OtherPROJECT HOSPITALITY INCNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC: $694,000 · OtherNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTAN…THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $637,981 · OtherTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY …GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $481,750 · OtherGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMU…URBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $352,500 · OtherURBAN JUSTICE CENTERNewYork-PresbyterianLawrence Hospital: $325,000 · OtherNewYork-PresbyterianLaw…FIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC: $290,000 · OtherBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $221,250 · OtherWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $285,000 · Other+16 more: $1,180,568 · Other+16 moreTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $1,715,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCI…Make the Road New York: $899,174 · Crime & LegalMake the Road New …LEGAL SERVICES NYC: $850,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES NYCTHE BRONX DEFENDERS: $660,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BRONX DEFENDER…+1 more: $60,000 · Crime & LegalBENEFITS DATA TRUST: $3,727,499 · EducationBENEFITS DATA TRU…The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $225,000 · EducationThe New York Publ…+1 more: $14,183 · EducationCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2,622,539 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR URBA…NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION: $681,325 · Community ImprovementNORTHERN MANHAT…FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $297,500 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK FOR N…PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS: $864,983 · HealthPUBLIC HE…THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $572,250 · HealthTHE FORTU…THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH: $300,000 · HealthTHE INSTI…HEALTH LEADS INC: $250,000 · HealthHEALTH LE…MEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC: $81,000 · Health+2 more: $96,091 · HealthPART OF THE SOLUTION: $426,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $425,000 · Food & NutritionSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $200,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $60,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$5,730,675Other$5,464,838Crime & Legal$4,184,174Education$3,966,682Community Improvement$3,601,364Health$2,164,324Food & Nutrition$1,111,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBENEFITS DATA TRUST: $3,727,499 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2,622,539 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $1,715,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $1,196,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $996,789 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $975,958 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMake the Road New York: $899,174 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS: $864,983 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES NYC: $850,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC: $694,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION: $681,325 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE BRONX DEFENDERS: $660,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $637,981 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $572,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $500,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $495,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $481,750 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $445,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $426,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $425,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $352,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNewYork-PresbyterianLawrence Hospital: $325,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC: $322,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH: $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $297,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARIVA INC: $291,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC: $290,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $285,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $270,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $266,694 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $260,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH LEADS INC: $250,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $221,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $215,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $168,523 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMet Council Inc: $157,279 over 3y, 56% of budgetHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC: $141,881 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetRESERVE ELDER SERVICE INC: $137,490 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC: $120,742 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChange Machine: $90,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC: $81,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN JAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGROW BROOKLYN INC: $65,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetLEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationMother Cabrini Health…The Hyde and Watson F…United Way of New Yor…The New York Communit…Research Foundation o…Altman FoundationThe Fan Fox and Lesli…Food Bank for New Yor…Booth Ferris Foundati…Brooklyn Community Fo…New York Immigration …
Robin Hood FoundationNY56.8× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · United Way of New York City · The New York Community Trust · Research Foundation of the City University of New York · Altman Foundation · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Food Bank for New York City · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Brooklyn Community Foundation · New York Immigration Coalition Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Single Stop USA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Single Stop USA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Hopes Community Action Partnership: 47% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Morris County Inc: 17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Single Stop USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home