Skip to content

· Private foundation

Singal Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$355kInternational$61kHuman Services$35kHealth$12kRecreation & Sports$5kFood & Nutrition$5kCivil Rights$4kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRATHAM USA$75,000
ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC$7,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$5,626
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$5,000
ASHA FOR EDUCATION$5,000
THE AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$5,000
INDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION$4,000
TEACH FOR INDIA US$3,000
BAPS CHARITIES INC$2,501
DESAI FOUNDATION$2,000
CHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC$2,000
LIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER$1,327
VRAJ$1,152
VEDANTA SOCIETY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC: $2k → 14%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $3k → 11%NATIONAL PARENTS ORGANIZATION: $1k → 8%NATIONAL PARENTS ORGANIZATION: $100 → 8%NATIONAL PARENTS ORGANIZATION: $100 → 8%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $15k → 17%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $3k → 16%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $5k → 17%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $1k → 16%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$315k · 16 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
23

Total granted

$315k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

69%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $203k · revenue +9%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +17%
  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MC
    MOBILE CRECHES FOR WORKING MOTHERS' CHILDREN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • IK
    IIT KANPUR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
3
Friends of Teach for India Inc

Empowering mobilizers like teach for india with intellectual, human, and financial resources to eliminate educational inequity in india.

Education
4
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
5
Iisc Foundation

The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…

Education
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
10
Akanksha Education Fund Inc

To support educational opportunities for underserved children in india, and raising support for and awareness of such activities in the united states.

International
11
Development Data Lab Inc

DDL`s Work is designed to widen public access to and use of economic, demographic and physical data that describes, defines and seeks to alleviate poverty, especially in the developing world

International
12
The Asia Foundation

The asia foundation (taf) is an international nonprofit organization working to solve the toughest social and economic challenges in asia and the pacific. (continued on schedule o)

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Liberty Science Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRATHAM USA: $203,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USACHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,001 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,100 · PhilanthropyVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $125,152 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $2,160 · EducationASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC: $29,002 · InternationalASSOCIATION FO…EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $17,665 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA…Asha for Education: $12,001 · InternationalAsha for Educa…+4 more: $2,869 · InternationalGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $25,001 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $3,500 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INC: $2,501 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesNational Parents Organization Inc: $1,200 · Human ServicesMOBILE CRECHES FOR WORKING MOTHERS' CHILDREN: $5,001 · OtherMOBILE CR…VRAJ: $4,155 · OtherVRAJTEACH FOR INDIA US: $3,500 · OtherTEACH FOR…OMKAR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,002 · OtherBRAHMA KUMARIS WORLD SPIRITUAL ORGANIZATION: $2,002 · OtherIIT KANPUR FOUNDATION: $2,001 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,501 · OtherAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $5,000 · OtherAKSHAYA P…INDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION: $4,000 · OtherINDIANS F…LIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER: $1,609 · Other+16 more: $8,446 · Other+16 moreAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $7,752 · Health+2 more: $201 · HealthNorthwestern University: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$215,101Education$127,312International$61,537Human Services$34,202Other$39,217Health$7,953Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATHAM USA: $203,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $125,152 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC: $29,002 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $25,001 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $17,665 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAsha for Education: $12,001 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $7,752 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESAI FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER: $1,609 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Parents Organization Inc: $1,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPYTHON SOFTWARE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $369 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $268 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $101 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVE: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIDDHIVINAAYAK TEMPLE INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN VALUES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bright Funds FoundationCA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Tarsadia Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Salesforce Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Network for Good · Shell USA Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Singal Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Singal Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Liberty Science Center: 14% of income from government
  • Python Software Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Singal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph