Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Silverweed Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$706kCrime & Legal$633kEducation$613kRecreation & Sports$230kYouth Development$175kFood & Nutrition$146kReligion$115kEnvironment$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC ART FUND INC$51,000
LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN$50,000
RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN$25,000
THE SYLVIA CENTER$25,000
KENYON COLLEGE$25,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$25,000
CITY PARKS FOUNDATION$25,000
ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL$15,000
GORDON PARK FOUNDATION$15,000
UNION OF REFORM JUDAISM$10,000
MANHATTAN THEATER COMPANY$7,500
LINCOLN CENTER THEATER$7,500
MUNICIPAL ART SOCIETY OF NEW YORK$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $25k → 20%WAVE HILL INCORPORATED: $25k → 28%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%KENYON COLLEGE: $65k → 12%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 17%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $25k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%KENYON COLLEGE: $55k → 12%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 17%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $25k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%KENYON COLLEGE: $50k → 12%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%KENYON COLLEGE: $50k → 12%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%KENYON COLLEGE: $35k → 12%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%KENYON COLLEGE: $25k → 12%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $93k → 17%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $75k → 17%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $51k → 17%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $50k → 17%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $50k → 17%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $50k → 17%PUBLIC ART FUND INC: $33k → 17%ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON: $25k → 17%CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%NYU LAW SCHOOL: $40k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $40k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $40k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $40k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $40k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $65k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 17%THE SYLVIA CENTER: $28k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 18 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
10

Total granted

$2.4M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+37%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $465k · revenue +40%
  • KENYON COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +37%
  • CP
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $170k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • NL
    NYU LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • WH
    WAVE HILL INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -4%
  • WNET
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

12
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wnet and the most unlike its peers is Grad Bag Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr21%15%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr11%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr21%3%20–35yr13%50%35–55yr11%35%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
11%
5,006/46,233

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PUBLIC ART FUND INC — $401,000 · OtherPUBLIC ART FUND INCNYU SCHOOL OF LAW — $160,000 · OtherNYU SCHOOL OF LAWUNION OF REFORM JUDAISM — $95,000 · OtherUNION OF REFORM JUDAISMMUNICIPAL ART SOCIETY OF NY — $65,000 · OtherMUNICIPAL ART SOCIETY OF NYGORDON PARK FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherGORDON PARK FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMANHATTAN THEATER COMPANY — $52,500 · OtherMANHATTAN THEATER COMPANYNYU LAW SCHOOL — $40,000 · Other+3 more — $25,400 · OtherLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $465,000 · Crime & LegalLAWYERS FOR CHILDRE…+1 more — $7,500 · Crime & LegalKENYON COLLEGE — $300,000 · EducationKENYON COLLEGEWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $45,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERS…ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $45,000 · EducationETHICAL CULTURE …+2 more — $7,500 · EducationRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $175,000 · Recreation & SportsRAMAPO FOR CHI…CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 · Recreation & SportsCITY PARKS FOU…RECESS ACTIVITIES INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER — $52,500 · Arts & CultureMunicipal Art Society of New York — $25,000 · Arts & CultureWNET — $25,000 · Arts & CultureMESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBROWN UNIVERSITY — $175,000 · Community ImprovementTHE SYLVIA CENTER — $145,800 · Food & NutritionWAVE HILL INCORPORATED — $25,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $7,500 · Environment
Other$953,900Crime & Legal$472,500Education$397,500Recreation & Sports$345,000Arts & Culture$187,500Community Improvement$175,000Food & Nutrition$145,800Environment$32,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $465,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPUBLIC ART FUND INC — $401,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE — $300,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SYLVIA CENTER — $145,800 over 7y, 11% of budgetRECESS ACTIVITIES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER — $52,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAVE HILL INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMunicipal Art Society of New York — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWNET — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAD BAG INC — $5,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds PUBLIC ART FUND INC
  • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE SYLVIA CENTER
  • Who funds RECESS ACTIVITIES INC
  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL
  • Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Municipal Art Society of New York
  • Who funds WNET
  • Who funds MESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds KIND INC
  • Who funds GRAD BAG INC
  • Who funds LET'S GET READY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Silverweed Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Silverweed Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Silverweed Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph