· Public charity
Spurs Give
Our mission is to strengthen and serve our community through impactful programming, player engagements, and investments that enrich the lives of youth and those around them.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $200,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $930,266 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $730,266 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAY SI | $100,000 |
| ESSENCE PREP INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $470k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JKJUST KEEP LIVIN FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2021 · $130k · revenue +156%
- MWMorgan's Wonderland3× · 2017–2019 · $90k · revenue +92%
- SOSTUDENTS OF SERVICE INC2× · 2017–2019 · $32k · revenue +326%
Funded once
- SASAN ANTONIO PARKS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $475k · revenue +99%
- JFJewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $133k · revenue -17%
- RMROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INCone grant, 2019 · $117k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…
To recruit, develop, and lead court-appointed volunteer advocates who provide constancy for abused and neglected children and youth while advocating for services and placement in safe and permanent homes.
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
The mission of Southwest Winners Foundation is to provide an adaptive and effective learning environment that prepares students for success in the workplace and/or college.
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
To provide alcohol and drug use prevention, intervention and recovery services to children, youth and adults in the community.
See schedule osan antonio academy of texas offers prekindergarten through eighth grade boys an exceptional academic program that features small classes, a family-like atmosphere, the development of a positive self image and a foundation…
San antonio preparatory charter school provides a college preparaory education through high quality instruction and rigorous curriculum inside a challenging and supportive learning environment ensuring all students can learn, grow, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sa Youth and the most unlike its peers is The Will Smith Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds JUST KEEP LIVIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds ESSENCE PREP INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHOSEN CARE INC ↗
- Who funds RISE RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SAY SI ↗
- Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PRESA COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SA YOUTH ↗
- Who funds San Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc ↗
- Who funds Voices for Children of San Antonio Community Research Center ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS OF SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds SASTEMIC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds SA TALENT INC SA WORKS ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
- Who funds YMCA of the Coastal Bend ↗
- Who funds HEALY-MURPHY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Spurs Give funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.