· Private foundation
Signs & Wonders Ministries
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| THE MISSION CO | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER | $1,000 |
| LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| LIPTAK PASTOR RICH KATHY | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| THE BOWERY MISSION | $250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.
21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CPCHOICES PREGNANCY SERVICES6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +43%
- NYNEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INC4× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +43%
- RCRHEMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- HCHILL CITY CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $13k
- TBTENNESSEE BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES INCone grant, 2021 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to share the Gospel and provide humanitarian support to the underprivileged, utilizing both mass media and direct, on-the-ground efforts in Africa and Asia.
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Religious ministry
Religious Purposes
As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…
To teach, preach, proclaim, publish, distribute and disseminate the gospel and doctrine of the christian faith. the ministry reaches approximately 1.5 million persons through its outreach ministries.
To spread the gospel of Jesus Christ to all the nations
Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible
How this is measured
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES PREGNANCY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds RHEMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ALPHA LIONS DEN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PILGRIM TRACT SOCIETY INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Signs & Wonders Ministries funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Signs & Wonders Ministries. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Signs & Wonders Ministries’ filings →