Skip to content
Siegmund & Marilyn Goldman Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Siegmund & Marilyn Goldman Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Arts & Culture$12kReligion$10kPhilanthropy$5kEnvironment$3kAnimals$1kHealth$1kInternational$860Civil Rights$350Other$0
02FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE EDUCATION CENTER$3,500
CONGREGATION FOR REFORMED JUDAISM$3,500
Individual grant recipient$100
CROHN'S FOUNDATION$100
BRENNAN CTR FOR JUSTICE$100
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100
NAMI$100
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$50
MSAA$50
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$50
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$50
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$50
Individual grant recipient$40
LUPUS FOUNDATION$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $50 → 16%THE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $100 → 12%HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION: $100 → 8%GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN: $50 → 10%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $50 → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $50 → 9%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $100 → 11%GIRLS TOWN BEIT CHANA SAFED: $50 → 20%HABITAT FOR HORSES: $100 → 10%MD ANDERSON CANCER: $100 → 16%INTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $100 → 12%WINTER PARK LAND TRUST: $3k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ORLANDO: $5k → 13%BLOOD CANCER UNITED: $50 → 13%SAVE THE CHIMPS: $100 → 13%WILD ANIMAL HEALTH FUND: $100 → 14%PASA: $100 → 8%MAP INTERNATIONAL: $50 → 14%FEED THE HUNGRY: $50 → 13%PAWS: $150 → 9%MSAA: $50 → 12%NAMI - NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $50 → 7%CAMERA: $60 → 16%FLAME: $50 → 10%RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK: $50 → 10%AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY (FORMALLY AABGU): $100 → 17%JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA (JINSA): $50 → 14%NAMI: $100 → 11%HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE EDUCATION CENTER: $5k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $50 → 17%HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE EDUCATION CENTER: $4k → 13%HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 13%HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE CENTER: $900 → 13%HILLEL INTERNATIONAL: $72 → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $100 → 17%PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $500 → 13%CONGREGATION FOR REFORMED JUDAISM: $4k → 13%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $250 → 17%ENGENDER HEALTH: $200 → 14%CONGREGATION OF REFORM JUDAISM: $3k → 13%BRENNAN CTR FOR JUSTICE: $100 → 17%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $75 → 14%CONGREGATION OF REFORM JUDAISM: $3k → 13%HADASSAH: $500 → 17%WUCF TVFM: $400 → 13%HADASSAH NATION: $400 → 17%CROHN'S FOUNDATION: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
VA
MD
KS
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 5 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
56

Total granted

$18k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
0%

Still filing today

40%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE EDUCATION CENTER
    2× · 2025–2026 · $9k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OF REFORM JUDAISM INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $6k
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k

Funded once

  • SO
    SHALOM ORLANDO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • WP
    WINTER PARK LAND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -34%
  • PA
    PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
5
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
6
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
7
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Winter Park Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
23/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE EDUCATION CENTER: $8,500 · OtherHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE EDUCATION CENTERCONGREGATION OF REFORM JUDAISM INC: $6,075 · OtherCONGREGATION OF REFORM JUDAISM INCCONGREGATION FOR REFORMED JUDAISM: $3,500 · OtherCONGREGATION FOR REFORMED JUDAISMHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE CENTER: $2,700 · OtherHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND RESOURCE CENTER+37 more: $3,439 · Other+37 moreSHALOM ORLANDO INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySHALOM ORLANDO I…+2 more: $100 · PhilanthropyWINTER PARK LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 · Environment+1 more: $50 · EnvironmentPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $200 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $100 · AnimalsSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $100 · AnimalsHUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION: $100 · AnimalsTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $100 · AnimalsJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 · InternationalENGENDERHEALTH INC: $225 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $75 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $60 · InternationalMAP International Inc: $50 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $50 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $50 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $50 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $50 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $50 · International+1 more: $25 · InternationalAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthNational Women's Health Network: $50 · HealthNAMI National: $50 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $50 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $40 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $25 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25 · HealthParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $25 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $20 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $100 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $100 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $50 · Education
Other$24,214Philanthropy$5,100Environment$2,550Animals$1,100International$1,035Health$385Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHALOM ORLANDO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINTER PARK LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGENDERHEALTH INC: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Women's Health Network: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Raymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Siegmund & Marilyn Goldman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Siegmund & Marilyn Goldman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shalom Orlando Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Siegmund & Marilyn Goldman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home