· Public charity
Shift Nc
Sexual health matters.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $249,121 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $256,061 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k4 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $222k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELON UNIVERSITY | $49,046 |
| POSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER | $35,000 |
| CROSSROADS | $35,000 |
| CITYGATE DREAM CENTER | $35,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALAMANCE COUNTY | $23,113 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $16,532 |
| LINCOLN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $15,000 |
| DURHAM COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH | $13,750 |
| CITY OF GREENSBORO PARKS AND RECREATION | $8,480 |
| BURLINGTON PEDIATRICS | $7,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY | $6,200 |
| PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC (BURLINGTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER) | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2021, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC4× · 2017–2020 · $592k · revenue +70%- LCLINCOLN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC5× · 2017–2021 · $176k · revenue +16%
- CACICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC4× · 2017–2020 · $155k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH INTERVENTIONS AND SICKLE CELL AGENCY INCone grant, 2017 · $86k
- WAWAYNE ACTION TEAMS FOR COMM HEALTHone grant, 2018 · $62k
- WAWAYNE ACTION TEAM FOR COMMUNITY HEALTHone grant, 2019 · $43k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.
Facilitate networking among hospitals
We are a crisis pregnancy center offering assistance to all women with pregnancy related issues.
Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…
Provide the highest quality, patient-centered health care services for low-income and other underserved individuals.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…
Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
To provide safe, effective, compassionate care and to promote healthy lifestyles to our community.
To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.
Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Port Health Services and the most unlike its peers is Cicatelli Associates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH INTERVENTIONS AND SICKLE CELL AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds ALAMANCE DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE & RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PORT HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · Alamance Community & Health Foundation · The Golden Leaf Inc · United Way of Alamance County · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shift Nc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.