Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sheila and Stanford L Kurland Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$690k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$531k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of Sheila and Stanford L Kurland Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Ucla Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
0
’20
0
’21
4
’22
7
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$1.8MPhilanthropy$416kReligion$338kRecreation & Sports$94kHealth$65kInternational$53kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $153k
  • $250k+1 grant · $531k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA Foundation$530,625
Sinai Akiba Academy$25,000
New Mexico State University Rodeo$25,000
Wilshire Boulevard Temple$25,000
Birthright Israel Foundation$18,000
ALS Network$10,000
American Friends of Sheba$10,000
Stand With Us$10,000
Hualalai Ohana Foundation$10,000
THE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$10,000
American Heart Association$10,000
United States Holocaust Memorial Mu$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BlueLine American Baseball: $6k → 10%Disabled Sports Eastern Sierra: $11k → 10%Verbum Dei Jesuit High School: $50k → 14%American Heart Association: $10k → 14%New Mexico State University Rodeo: $25k → 23%THE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $10k → 14%Stand With Us: $10k → 9%Ian's Friends Foundation: $25k → 13%United States Holocaust Memorial Mu: $6k → 8%Virginia Athletics Foundation: $8k → 8%GLOBAL IMPACT EAPS: $25k → 9%Temple Aliyah: $10k → 14%New Mexico State University Rodeo: $25k → 23%Temple Aliyah: $10k → 14%New Mexico State University Rodeo: $25k → 23%UCLA Foundation: $531k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $525k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $500k → 14%Sinai Temple: $25k → 14%Sinai Akiba Academy: $25k → 14%Young Israel of North Beverly Hills: $20k → 14%Wilshire Boulevard Temple: $198k → 14%Wilshire Boulevard Temple: $50k → 14%Wilshire Boulevard Temple: $25k → 14%American Friends of Sheba: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
VA
NM
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$426k · 5 repeat orgs$376k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$426k
$295k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+28%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WB
    WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $273k
  • NM
    New Mexico State University Rodeo
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $43k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +130%
  • VD
    VERBUM DEI JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
University of California Merced Foundation

The uc merced foundation was formed for the purpose of encouraging voluntary private gifts, trusts, and bequests for the benefit of the university of california, merced.

Education
3
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
4
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
7
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
8
San Jose State University Research Foundation

As an integral member of the san jose state university community, the san jose state university research foundation provides an entrepreneurial framework through which local, state and federal agencies, businesses and private foundations…

Education
9
Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation Inc

The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.

Health
10
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia Student Aid Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vijay Amritraj Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA FOUNDATION: $1,580,625 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION+4 more: $39,000 · EducationWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $273,390 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLENew Mexico State University Rodeo: $75,000 · OtherNew Mexico State Universit…VERBUM DEI JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherVERBUM DEI JESUIT HIGH SCH…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherSINAI TEMPLE: $25,000 · OtherSinai Temple: $25,000 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF NORTH BEVERLY HILLS: $20,000 · OtherTEMPLE ALIYAH INC: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $48,500 · Other+7 moreIAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthALS Network: $10,000 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $43,000 · InternationalJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesVIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION: $3,600 · Social Science
Education$1,719,625Other$561,890Health$45,000International$43,000Human Services$10,000Social Science$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,580,625 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS MAMMOTH ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALS Network ↗
  • Who funds JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sheila and Stanford L Kurland Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sheila and Stanford L Kurland Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sheila and Stanford L Kurland Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph