Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sharpe Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

55% of Sharpe Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 20 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Sharpe Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $50k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’19
2
’20
4
’21
8
’22
11
’23
11
’24
20
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$260kReligion$139kHuman Services$70kRecreation & Sports$36kHealth$32kEducation$27kEmployment$27kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP HORIZON$4,000
KELCURT FOUNDATION$4,000
THE EXCEPTIONAL BEAN$4,000
RENEW A NATION$3,000
FRIENDS OF THE TROOPS$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
BRIGHT SCHOOL$2,002
CHATTANOOGA HEART ASSOCIATION$2,001
AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
RHEA COUNTY BEEKEEPERS ASSOC$2,000
KIDNEY FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
GPS IMPACT FUND$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%hospice of chattanooga: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 35 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
19

Total granted

$344k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+33%

Still filing today

31%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionEmploymentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EB
    EXCEPTIONAL BEAN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +33%
  • R
    RENEWANATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +25%
  • KF
    Kelcurt Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BU
    burk un methodist churc
    one grant, 2020 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
2
New Hope Academy

Christ-centered school educating children of diverse racial & socioeconomic backgrounds by establishing a biblical worldview & preparing each child to flourish academically, emotionally, socially & spiritually.

Education
3
Harding Academy of Memphis Inc

Harding academy of memphis, inc. is a private school providing education from pre kindergarten through grade twelve.

Education
4
The King's Christian School

The king's christian school is a k-12 prepatory school that equips and strengthens students through education and example, that they might stand firmly upon the word of god and to become effective servant-leaders who impact the world…

—
5
Chattanooga Christian School Inc

To prepare students to lead and serve with distinction while representing christ and his kingdom in all areas of home, church, society and culture.

Education
6
Crawford Christian Academy

Christian day school with pre-k thru 12

Education
7
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education
8
Harrells Christian Academy

The mission of harrells christian academy is to prepare each student for higher education within an environment that instills judeo-christian values, fosters self-discipline, enhances creativity, and promises a love and respect for…

Education
9
Cookson Hills Christian School Inc

Cookson hills christian school has been providing home, school, and therapy for kids who are at-risk, since 1957.

Human Services
10
Campbell County Christian Academy Inc

To partner with families in providing students a christ-centered and academically challenging education equipping them with a biblical worldview as they grow in understandings, attitudes, skills, and in favor with god and man.

Education
11
Hamilton Christian Academy

The organization is a christian school with the purpose of educating students in grades pre-k-12 with a christian curriculum with christian teachers in a christian environment.

—
12
Christian School of Southern York County

Christian education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Kelcurt Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP HORIZON INC: $35,939 · OtherCAMP HORIZON INCBURKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $28,510 · OtherBURKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHburk un methodist churc: $20,555 · Otherburk un methodist churcNEW UNION BAPTIST CHURCH: $19,750 · OtherNEW UNION BAPTIST CHURCHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,230 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherNORTH RIVER METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · Other+52 more: $195,511 · Other+52 moreCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $259,989 · PhilanthropyCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…+1 more: $8,000 · PhilanthropyRENEWANATION: $16,000 · EducationBOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationBRIGHT SCHOOL INC: $6,002 · EducationPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE: $5,000 · EducationSKYUKA HALL: $4,250 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationEXCEPTIONAL BEAN: $25,500 · EmploymentON POINT: $10,000 · HealthRHEA OF SUNSHINE INCORPORATED: $3,000 · HealthKelcurt Foundation Inc: $12,805 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF THE TROOPS: $11,000 · Public Benefit
Other$368,495Philanthropy$267,989Education$39,752Employment$25,500Health$13,000Community Improvement$12,805Public Benefit$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXCEPTIONAL BEAN: $25,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetRENEWANATION: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKelcurt Foundation Inc: $12,805 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TROOPS: $11,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetON POINT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $8,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLAZING HOPE RANCH: $7,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBRIGHT SCHOOL INC: $6,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSKYUKA HALL: $4,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHEA COUNTY FAIR: $3,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHEA OF SUNSHINE INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOURNEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESIRING ADVANCEMENT OVERSEAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRHEA RICHLAND SENIOR NEIGHBORS INC: $660 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL BEAN ↗
  • Who funds RENEWANATION ↗
  • Who funds Kelcurt Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TROOPS ↗
  • Who funds ON POINT ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER ↗
  • Who funds BOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BLAZING HOPE RANCH ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE 247 MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds SKYUKA HALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Schillhahn-Huskey Foundation · George R Johnson Family Foundation · Jack and Charlotte Frost Family Foundation · Hamico Inc · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Benwood Foundation Inc · McKenzie Foundation D/B/A the McKenzie Foundation · Tucker Foundation · Steve and Lisa Frost Family Foundation · Frank Jb & Emma S Varallo Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sharpe Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sharpe Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sharpe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph