Skip to content

Tennessee · Nonprofit

ON POINT

ON POINT (Tennessee) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,750,360 to it, the largest being CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,485,970). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.3M
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$4.8M
Net assets
$795k
17/21 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 76%
01What it does

What On Point does

Mission

On Point partners with schools and communities to cultivate the strengths in youth and guide them on their path to thrive.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. On Point provides education and support of students, parents and the community about the benefits of making healthy choices, emphasizing the cultivation of developmental assets to promote positive attitudes and behaviors in youth. We do this through the following programs: 1) think On Point (5 dosage hours of risk avoidance and healthy choices curricula); 2) life On Point (weekly group mentoring program utilizing strengths-based curricula); 3) graduate On Point (program targeting youth at risk of not graduating with their cohort; focus on credit recovery and life On Point programming); 4) teen advisory board (comprised of 15 high school students),focus on leadership and service); 5) community education (asset and curricula trainings for community partners); 6) community school (offer wrap-around supports for students and families to create opportunities that cultivate students' well-being and academic success).

    $1,098,275 spent$115,043 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,098,275.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($277k)2018 Revenue 111 ($1.3M) Expenses 94 ($1.2M) Net assets 116 ($321k)2019 Revenue 108 ($1.3M) Expenses 90 ($1.2M) Net assets 137 ($379k)2020 Revenue 105 ($1.2M) Expenses 90 ($1.2M) Net assets 149 ($412k)2021 Revenue 84 ($973k) Expenses 72 ($952k) Net assets 156 ($433k)2022 Revenue 106 ($1.2M) Expenses 82 ($1.1M) Net assets 207 ($575k)2023 Revenue 112 ($1.3M) Expenses 87 ($1.2M) Net assets 260 ($720k)2024 Revenue 99 ($1.1M) Expenses 83 ($1.1M) Net assets 274 ($759k)2025 Revenue 112 ($1.3M) Expenses 95 ($1.3M) Net assets 287 ($795k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (112)Expenses (95)Net assets (287)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $794k to $1.0M (+26%).

$295k
$351k
$412k
$607k
$809k
$794k
$1.0M
$1.0M
$1.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 9% · 2018 15% · 2019 16% · 2020 15% · 2021 11% · 2022 15% · 2023 13% · 2024 7% · 2025 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of ON POINT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,632 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$163k
’17
$43k
’18
$58k
’19
$33k
’20
$21k
’21
$141k
’22
$145k
’23
$39k
’24
$36k
’25
7.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Amy Pearson

Executive director

Board chair

Kari Gilliland

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121111108910129
Joined·+2+0+1+2+2+2+2+0
No longer listed·30241103
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $193k → $988k.

6 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 44% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ON POINT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ON POINT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 31% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ON POINT.

31%
largest funder
66%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 45% · 2018 42% · 2019 50% · 2020 39% · 2021 48% · 2022 36% · 2023 33% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

63% of ON POINT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 81% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

99% of ON POINT's grant income comes from Tennessee funders.

DE
TN
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Tennessee out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ON POINT is better cushioned than half of the 5,002 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve7.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,002 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like ON POINT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Tennessee

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 6%Fundraising 7%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ON POINT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ON POINT?
ON POINT (Tennessee) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,750,360 to it, the largest being CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,485,970). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ON POINT have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $4,750,360 in grants to ON POINT, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ON POINT?
CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,485,970 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ON POINT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Tennessee. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds On Point →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing